Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26068957›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Steroid-eluting sinus stents for improving symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Zhenxiao Huang, Peter Hwang, Yan Sun, Bing Zhou

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03188822 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Steroid Delivery to the Frontal Sinus Opening With a Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Implant vs. a Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing With Added Steroid

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RochesterRan2017 to 2021Enrolled9ConditionsChronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)ArmsBioabsorbable steroid releasing sinus implant, Bioabsorbable nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
NCT03534362 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Propel Stent vs Kenalog-soaked Nasopore After Frontal Drill-out

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Louis UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled1ConditionsStent, Sinusitis, FrontalArmsNasopore, Propel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Efficacy and safety of pulmicort repulas-impregnated nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Risk Factors of Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  7. Evidence and evidence gaps in therapies of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenxiao HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China, 100730.
Peter Hwang
Yan Sun
Bing Zhou
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has become a well-established approach for treating patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to medical management. However, the surgical outcome may be compromised by postoperative inflammation, polyposis and adhesions, which often require subsequent intervention. Bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting sinus stents are inserted into the nose, sinuses or both following surgery to prevent stenosis of the sinus openings during the postoperative healing period. The slow release of corticosteroid aims to decrease mucosal oedema and expedite wound healing. Whether a steroid-eluting stent offers any beneficial effects in terms of improving sinonasal symptoms has not been systematically reviewed.

objectivesTo assess the safety and efficacy of steroid-eluting sinus stent placement in CRS patients after FESS. SEARCH

methodsThe Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group (CENTDG) Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the CENTDG Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 4); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; Clinicaltrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 14 May 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing steroid-eluting sinus stents with non-steroid-eluting sinus stents, nasal packing or no treatment in adult CRS patients undergoing FESS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN

resultsWe identified no RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. Among the 159 records retrieved using our search strategy, 21 trials had the potential to be included given that they had tested sinus stents, spacers and packing materials for patients with CRS undergoing FESS. However, we excluded these trials from the review because they met some but not all of the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe are unable to provide evidence to establish whether steroid-eluting sinus stents have potential advantages and disadvantages for patients with CRS undergoing FESS. Future, high-quality RCTs are needed to assess whether or not steroid-eluting sinus stents confer any beneficial effects, over those of surgery alone, when compared to non-steroid sinus stents.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsChronic DiseaseEndoscopyHumansRhinitisSinusitisSteroidsSteroids

Identifiers

PMID26068957
PMCPMC11112646
OpenAlexW1769297296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.