Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26068722›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2015

Implementation and Operational Research: Reconstructing the PMTCT Cascade Using Cross-sectional Household Survey Data: The PEARL Study.

Benjamin H Chi, Pius M Tih, Arianna Zanolini, Kathryn Stinson, Didier K Ekouevi, David Coetzee, Thomas K Welty, Maximillian Bweupe, Nathan Shaffer, Francois Dabis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Benjamin H Chi*University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; †Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; ‡Cameroon Baptist Health Convention Health Board, Bamenda, Cameroon; §University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; ‖INSERM, Centre INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; ¶University of Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897, Bordeaux, France; #Programme PAC-CI, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire; **Zambian Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia; and ††World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pius M Tih
Arianna Zanolini
Kathryn Stinson
Didier K Ekouevi
David Coetzee
Thomas K Welty
Maximillian Bweupe
Nathan Shaffer
Francois Dabis
Elizabeth M Stringer
Jeffrey S A Stringer

Funding

Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating CenterR25TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.9M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009340PHS HHS T0906150021World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the ambitious targets to reduce pediatric AIDS worldwide, ongoing assessment of programs to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) is critical. The concept of a "PMTCT cascade" has been used widely to identify bottlenecks in program implementation; however, most efforts to reconstruct the cascade have relied on facility-based approaches that may limit external validity.

methodsWe analyzed data from the PEARL household survey, which measured PMTCT effectiveness in 26 communities across Zambia, South Africa, Cote d'Ivoire, and Cameroon. We recruited women who reported a delivery in the past 2 years. Among mothers confirmed to be HIV infected at the time of survey, we reconstructed the PMTCT cascade with self-reported participant information. We also analyzed data about the child's vital status; for those still alive, HIV testing was performed by DNA polymerase chain reaction testing.

resultsOf the 976 eligible women, only 355 (36%) completed every step of the PMTCT cascade. Among the 621 mother-child pairs who did not, 22 (4%) reported never seeking antenatal care, 103 (17%) were not tested for HIV during pregnancy, 395 (64%) reported testing but never received their HIV-positive result, 48 (8%) did not receive maternal antiretroviral prophylaxis, and 53 (9%) did not receive infant antiretroviral prophylaxis. The lowest prevalence of infant HIV infection or death was observed in those completing the cascade (10%, 95% confidence interval: 7% to 12%).

conclusionsFuture efforts to measure population PMTCT impact should incorporate dimensions explored in the PEARL study-including HIV testing of HIV-exposed children in household surveys-to better understand program effectiveness.

Indexed as

AdultAfricaChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalePregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26068722
PMCPMC4773194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.