Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26068720›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2015

Outcomes of a Clinic-Based Surveillance-Informed Intervention to Relink Patients to HIV Care.

Joanna M Bove, Matthew R Golden, Shireesha Dhanireddy, Robert D Harrington, Julia C Dombrowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanna M Bove*Center for AIDS and STD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; †Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ‡Public Health-Seattle & King County HIV/STD Program, Seattle, WA; and §Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Matthew R Golden
Shireesha Dhanireddy
Robert D Harrington
Julia C Dombrowski

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARI M KITAHATA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Clinic and Population-Based Approaches to Retention in HIV CareK23MH090923 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOMBROWSKI, JULIA COOK · 2010 to 2014
$657k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS P30AI027757NIMH NIH HHS 5K23MH090923NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH090923NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH095060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving patient retention in HIV care is crucial to improving the HIV care continuum. We instituted and evaluated a relinkage program that uses clinical data to identify potentially out-of-care patients, matches those data to public health surveillance, and employs a linkage specialist (LS) to coordinate care relinkage.

methodsThe intervention began November 1, 2012, in the largest HIV clinic in Washington State. We evaluated program outcomes and compared patient outcomes in the year after initiation of the intervention to a historical control cohort of patients. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare time to relinkage to care between cohorts, and regression models using generalized estimated equations were preformed to examine secondary outcomes of relinkage to care, engagement in care, and viral suppression.

resultsA total of 753 patients were identified as "out of care" on November 1, 2012. Matching with surveillance data and initial LS investigations found that 596 (79%) of these patients had moved, transferred care, or were incarcerated. Of the 157 remaining patients, 40 (25%) relinked to care before LS contact, and the LS successfully contacted 38 (24%). A total of 116 (15%) patients in the intervention cohort relinked to care and 24 (20%) were contacted by the LS. Compared with the historical cohort, the time to relinkage was shorter among patients in the intervention cohort [adjusted hazard ratio = 1.7 (1.2-2.3)] and a greater proportion relinked (15% vs. 10%).

conclusionsThis clinic-based surveillance-informed relinkage intervention showed statistically significant but modest effectiveness in returning out-of-care patients to HIV care compared with historical controls.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilityAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID26068720
PMCPMC4607589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.