Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26068439›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Analyzing the Functions of Mast Cells In Vivo Using 'Mast Cell Knock-in' Mice.

Nicolas Gaudenzio, Riccardo Sibilano, Philipp Starkl, Mindy Tsai, Stephen J Galli, Laurent L Reber

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A Critical Role for NaJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolas GaudenzioDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Riccardo SibilanoDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Philipp StarklDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Mindy TsaiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Stephen J GalliDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Laurent L ReberDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine; lreber@stanford.edu.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1RR025744 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2008 to 2011
$22.4M
Neutrophils as therapeutic targets in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromeK99AI110645 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REBER, LAURENT LIONEL · 2014 to 2014
$130k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025744NIAID NIH HHS K99AI110645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mast cells (MCs) are hematopoietic cells which reside in various tissues, and are especially abundant at sites exposed to the external environment, such as skin, airways and gastrointestinal tract. Best known for their detrimental role in IgE-dependent allergic reactions, MCs have also emerged as important players in host defense against venom and invading bacteria and parasites. MC phenotype and function can be influenced by microenvironmental factors that may differ according to anatomic location and/or based on the type or stage of development of immune responses. For this reason, we and others have favored in vivo approaches over in vitro methods to gain insight into MC functions. Here, we describe methods for the generation of mouse bone marrow-derived cultured MCs (BMCMCs), their adoptive transfer into genetically MC-deficient mice, and the analysis of the numbers and distribution of adoptively transferred MCs at different anatomical sites. This method, named the 'mast cell knock-in' approach, has been extensively used over the past 30 years to assess the functions of MCs and MC-derived products in vivo. We discuss the advantages and limitations of this method, in light of alternative approaches that have been developed in recent years.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCell TransplantationFemaleMaleMast CellsMiceMice, TransgenicSkin

Identifiers

PMID26068439
PMCPMC4542964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.