Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26068417›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Suicide in Recent Onset Psychosis Revisited: Significant Reduction of Suicide Rate over the Last Two Decades - A Replication Study of a Dutch Incidence Cohort.

Stynke Castelein, Edith J Liemburg, Jill S de Lange, Frank D van Es, Ellen Visser, André Aleman, Richard Bruggeman, Henderikus Knegtering

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Suicide in the Early Stage of Schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stynke CasteleinRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Lentis Research, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Edith J LiemburgRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; NeuroImaging Center, Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jill S de LangeRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frank D van EsRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; University Center for Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ellen VisserRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
André AlemanNeuroImaging Center, Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Richard BruggemanRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; University Center for Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henderikus KnegteringRob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Lentis Research, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands; NeuroImaging Center, Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to compare the suicide risk over the past decade following recent onset psychosis to findings from the eighties and nineties in the same catchment area and to identify predictors of suicide in the context of the Psychosis Recent Onset Groningen-Survey (PROGR-S). A medical file search was carried out to determine the current status of all patients admitted between 2000 and 2009. The suicide rate was compared with a study executed in 1973-1988 in the same catchment area. Predictors of suicide were investigated using Cox regression. The status of 424 of the 614 patients was known in July 2014. Suicide occurred in 2.4% of patients with psychosis disorders (n = 10; mean follow-up 5.6 years); 6 out of 10 suicides took place within two years. Within two decades, the suicide rate dropped from 11% (follow-up 15 years, 8.5% after 5 years) to 2.4%. The Standardized Mortality Rate (SMR) of suicides compared with the general population was 41.6. A higher age was the only significant predictor for suicide. Neuroticism, living situation, disorganized and negative symptoms, and passive coping style all showed a trend for significance. A significant reduction in the suicide rate was found for people with psychosis over the past decades. Given the high SMR, suicide research should be given the highest priority. Identifying predictors may contribute to further reduction of suicide among patients with psychosis.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPsychotic DisordersSuicide

Identifiers

PMID26068417
PMCPMC4466318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.