ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Stochastic Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Stability and Flexibility.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain network dynamics reflect psychiatric illness status and transdiagnostic symptom profiles across health and disease.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Control adjustment costs limit goal flexibility: Empirical evidence and a computational account.Psychological review · 2026Article
- Exploring early-stage orienting behavior using an eye tracker for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cognitive flexibility versus stability via activation-based and weight-based adaptations.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Slower transitions between control states lead to reductions in cognitive flexibility over the lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Connectome-constrained ligand-receptor interaction analysis for understanding brain network communication.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Convergent neural dynamical systems for task control in artificial networks and human brains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Striatal arbitration between choice strategies guides few-shot adaptation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Broadscale dampening of uncertainty adjustment in the aging brain.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Variability and harshness shape flexible strategy-use in support of the constrained flexibility framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Humans reconfigure target and distractor processing to address distinct task demands.Psychological review · 2024Article
- Is Cognitive Flexibility Equivalent to Shifting? Investigating Cognitive Flexibility in Multiple Domains.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Dynamic neuronal instability generates synaptic plasticity and behavior: Insights from Drosophila sleep.Neuroscience research · 2024Review
- Fractal basins as a mechanism for the nimble brain.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Individual differences in resilience to stress are associated with affective flexibility.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Modelling human behaviour in cognitive tasks with latent dynamical systems.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Pushing the Bounds of Bounded Optimality and Rationality.Cognitive science · 2023Article
- The modulatory effect of adaptive task-switching training on resting-state neural network dynamics in younger and older adults.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive stability and flexibility are core functions in the successful pursuit of behavioral goals. While there is evidence for a common frontoparietal network underlying both functions and for a key role of dopamine in the modulation of flexible versus stable behavior, the exact neurocomputational mechanisms underlying those executive functions and their adaptation to environmental demands are still unclear. In this work we study the neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cue based task switching (flexibility) and distractor inhibition (stability) in a paradigm specifically designed to probe both functions. We develop a physiologically plausible, explicit model of neural networks that maintain the currently active task rule in working memory and implement the decision process. We simplify the four-choice decision network to a nonlinear drift-diffusion process that we canonically derive from a generic winner-take-all network model. By fitting our model to the behavioral data of individual subjects, we can reproduce their full behavior in terms of decisions and reaction time distributions in baseline as well as distractor inhibition and switch conditions. Furthermore, we predict the individual hemodynamic response timecourse of the rule-representing network and localize it to a frontoparietal network including the inferior frontal junction area and the intraparietal sulcus, using functional magnetic resonance imaging. This refines the understanding of task-switch-related frontoparietal brain activity as reflecting attractor-like working memory representations of task rules. Finally, we estimate the subject-specific stability of the rule-representing attractor states in terms of the minimal action associated with a transition between different rule states in the phase-space of the fitted models. This stability measure correlates with switching-specific thalamocorticostriatal activation, i.e., with a system associated with flexible working memory updating and dopaminergic modulation of cognitive flexibility. These results show that stochastic dynamical systems can implement the basic computations underlying cognitive stability and flexibility and explain neurobiological bases of individual differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.