Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26068101›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Evolution of the SH3 Domain Specificity Landscape in Yeasts.

Erik Verschueren, Matthias Spiess, Areti Gkourtsa, Teja Avula, Christiane Landgraf, Victor Tapia Mancilla, Aline Huber, Rudolf Volkmer, Barbara Winsor, Luis Serrano and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Erik VerschuerenEMBL/CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation-CRG, Barcelona, Spain.
Matthias SpiessDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Genetics, UMR7156, Université de Strasbourg and CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Areti GkourtsaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Teja AvulaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christiane LandgrafInstitut für Medizinische Immunologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Victor Tapia MancillaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Genetics, UMR7156, Université de Strasbourg and CNRS, Strasbourg, France; Institut für Medizinische Immunologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Aline HuberDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Genetics, UMR7156, Université de Strasbourg and CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Rudolf VolkmerInstitut für Medizinische Immunologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara WinsorDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Genetics, UMR7156, Université de Strasbourg and CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Luis SerranoEMBL/CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation-CRG, Barcelona, Spain.
Frans HochstenbachDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben DistelDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEAcademic Medical Center · NLCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the conservation of Src homology 3 (SH3) domain-mediated networks in evolution, we compared the specificity landscape of these domains among four yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ashbya gossypii, Candida albicans, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, encompassing 400 million years of evolution. We first aligned and catalogued the families of SH3-containing proteins in these four species to determine the relationships between homologous domains. Then, we tagged and purified all soluble SH3 domains (82 in total) to perform a quantitative peptide assay (SPOT) for each SH3 domain. All SPOT readouts were hierarchically clustered and we observed that the organization of the SH3 specificity landscape in three distinct profile classes remains conserved across these four yeast species. We also produced a specificity profile for each SH3 domain from manually aligned top SPOT hits and compared the within-family binding motif consensus. This analysis revealed a striking example of binding motif divergence in a C. albicans Rvs167 paralog, which cannot be explained by overall SH3 sequence or interface residue divergence, and we validated this specificity change with a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay. In addition, we show that position-weighted matrices (PWM) compiled from SPOT assays can be used for binding motif screening in potential binding partners and present cases where motifs are either conserved or lost among homologous SH3 interacting proteins. Finally, by comparing pairwise SH3 sequence identity to binding profile correlation we show that for ~75% of all analyzed families the SH3 specificity profile was remarkably conserved over a large evolutionary distance. Thus, a high sequence identity within an SH3 domain family predicts conserved binding specificity, whereas divergence in sequence identity often coincided with a change in binding specificity within this family. As such, our results are important for future studies aimed at unraveling complex specificity networks of peptide recognition domains in higher eukaryotes, including mammals.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesCandida albicansFungal ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiarySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesSequence Alignmentsrc Homology DomainsTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesYeastsFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26068101
PMCPMC4466140
OpenAlexW588646564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.