Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26067994›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Characteristics of Spontaneous Square-Wave Jerks in the Healthy Macaque Monkey during Visual Fixation.

Francisco M Costela, Jorge Otero-Millan, Michael B McCamy, Stephen L Macknik, Leandro L Di Stasi, Héctor Rieiro, John R Leigh, Xoana G Troncoso, Ali Najafian Jazi, Susana Martinez-Conde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Francisco M CostelaDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Interdisciplinary Graduate program in Neuroscience, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Jorge Otero-MillanDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Michael B McCamyDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.
Stephen L MacknikDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America.
Leandro L Di StasiDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center; University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Héctor RieiroDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
John R LeighVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Xoana G TroncosoDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Unité de Neuroscience, Information et Complexité (CNRS-UNIC), UPR CNRS 3293, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ali Najafian JaziDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America.
Susana Martinez-CondeDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America.
Barrow Neurological Institute · USArizona State University · USBrain (Germany) · DECase Western Reserve University · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversidade de Vigo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic intrusions (SIs), predominantly horizontal saccades that interrupt accurate fixation, include square-wave jerks (SWJs; the most common type of SI), which consist of an initial saccade away from the fixation target followed, after a short delay, by a return saccade that brings the eye back onto target. SWJs are present in most human subjects, but are prominent by their increased frequency and size in certain parkinsonian disorders and in recessive, hereditary spinocerebellar ataxias. SWJs have been also documented in monkeys with tectal and cerebellar etiologies, but no studies to date have investigated the occurrence of SWJs in healthy nonhuman primates. Here we set out to determine the characteristics of SWJs in healthy rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) during attempted fixation of a small visual target. Our results indicate that SWJs are common in healthy nonhuman primates. We moreover found primate SWJs to share many characteristics with human SWJs, including the relationship between the size of a saccade and its likelihood to be part of a SWJ. One main discrepancy between monkey and human SWJs was that monkey SWJs tended to be more vertical than horizontal, whereas human SWJs have a strong horizontal preference. Yet, our combined data indicate that primate and human SWJs play a similar role in fixation correction, suggesting that they share a comparable coupling mechanism at the oculomotor generation level. These findings constrain the potential brain areas and mechanisms underlying the generation of fixational saccades in human and nonhuman primates.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularAnimalsBrainHumansMacaca mulattaMotor ActivitySaccades

Identifiers

PMID26067994
PMCPMC4466238
OpenAlexW1587686700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.