Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26067534›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2015

Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Stephen Sebastian, Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Joint coding of shape and blur in area V4.Nature communications · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The natural statistics of blur.Journal of vision · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen Sebastian
Johannes Burge
Wilson S Geisler
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION OF TWO DIMENSIONAL PATTERNSR01EY011747 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI GEISLER, WILSON S · 1997 to 2022
$6.4M
CPS Training ProgramT32EY021462 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Mary M Hayhoe, Alexander C Huk · 2012 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS 1T32-EY021462NEI NIH HHS 2R01-EY011747NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011747NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lens system in the human eye is able to best focus light from only one distance at a time.Therefore, many objects in the natural environment are not imaged sharply on the retina. Furthermore, light from objects in the environment is subject to the particular aberrations of the observer's lens system (e.g., astigmatism and chromatic aberration). We refer to blur created by the observer's optics as "natural" or "defocus" blur as opposed to "on-screen" blur created by software on a display screen. Although blur discrimination has been studied extensively, human ability to discriminate defocus blur in images of natural scenes has not been systematically investigated. Here, we measured discrimination of defocus blur for a collection of natural image patches, sampled from well-focused photographs. We constructed a rig capable of presenting stimuli at three physical distances simultaneously. In Experiment 1, subjects viewed monocularly two simultaneously presented natural image patches through a 4-mm artificial pupil at ±1° eccentricity. The task was to identify the sharper patch. Discrimination thresholds varied substantially between stimuli but were correlated between subjects. The lowest thresholds were at or below the lowest thresholds ever reported. In a second experiment, we paralyzed accommodation and retested a subset of conditions from Experiment 1. A third experiment showed that removing contrast as a cue to defocus blur had only a modest effect on thresholds. Finally, we describe a simple masking model and evaluate how well it can explain our experimental results and the results from previous blur discrimination experiments.

Indexed as

AdultAstigmatismFemaleHumansLens, CrystallineMathematicsPattern Recognition, VisualPsychophysicsRetinaSensory Thresholds

Identifiers

PMID26067534
PMCPMC4419382
OpenAlexW2131151700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.