Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26066606›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2015

A Comparative Study of Vertebrate Corneal Structure: The Evolution of a Refractive Lens.

Moritz Winkler, Golroxan Shoa, Stephanie T Tran, Yilu Xie, Sarah Thomasy, Vijay K Raghunathan, Christopher Murphy, Donald J Brown, James V Jester

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moritz WinklerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States.
Golroxan ShoaGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States.
Stephanie T TranGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States.
Yilu XieGavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States.
Sarah ThomasyUniversity of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States.
Vijay K RaghunathanUniversity of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States.
Christopher MurphyUniversity of California-Davis, Davis, California, United States.
Donald J BrownDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States 2Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States.
James V JesterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States 2Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, United States.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Noninvasive 3D Microscopic Studies of Corneal Elasticity and Collagen StructureR01EY018665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JUHASZ, TIBOR · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY018665NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough corneal curvature plays an important role in determining the refractive power of the vertebrate eye, the mechanisms controlling corneal shape remain largely unknown. To address this question, we performed a comparative study of vertebrate corneal structure to identify potential evolutionarily based changes that correlate with the development of a corneal refractive lens.

methodsNonlinear optical (NLO) imaging of second-harmonic-generated (SHG) signals was used to image collagen and three-dimensionally reconstruct the lamellar organization in corneas from different vertebrate clades.

resultsSecond-harmonic-generated images taken normal to the corneal surface showed that corneal collagen in all nonmammalian vertebrates was organized into sheets (fish and amphibians) or ribbons (reptiles and birds) extending from limbus to limbus that were oriented nearly orthogonal (ranging from 77.7°-88.2°) to their neighbors. The slight angular offset (2°-13°) created a rotational pattern that continued throughout the full thickness in fish and amphibians and to the very posterior layers in reptiles and birds. Interactions between lamellae were limited to "sutural" fibers in cartilaginous fish, and occasional lamellar branching in fish and amphibians. There was a marked increase in lamellar branching in higher vertebrates, such that birds ≫ reptiles > amphibians > fish. By contrast, mammalian corneas showed a nearly random collagen fiber organization with no orthogonal, chiral pattern.

conclusionsOur data indicate that nonmammalian vertebrate corneas share a common orthogonal collagen structural organization that shows increased lamellar branching in higher vertebrate species. Importantly, mammalian corneas showed a different structural organization, suggesting a divergent evolutionary background.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnatomy, ComparativeAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsCollagenCorneaFishesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLens, CrystallineMammalsMicroscopy, ConfocalNonlinear DynamicsReptilesSpecies SpecificityCollagen

Identifiers

PMID26066606
PMCPMC4416662
OpenAlexW2400665456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.