Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26066390›Full record

Trial reportAIDS research and human retroviruses2015

Simultaneous Evaluation of Safety, Acceptability, Pericoital Kinetics, and Ex Vivo Pharmacodynamics Comparing Four Rectal Microbicide Vehicle Candidates.

Francisco Leyva, Edward J Fuchs, Rahul Bakshi, Alex Carballo-Dieguez, Ana Ventuneac, Chen Yue, Brian Caffo, Yong Du, Michael Torbenson, Liye Li and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Francisco Leyva1 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Edward J Fuchs1 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Rahul Bakshi1 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Alex Carballo-Dieguez2 Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Ana Ventuneac2 Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Chen Yue3 Department of Biostatistics, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland.
Brian Caffo3 Department of Biostatistics, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland.
Yong Du4 Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael Torbenson5 Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Liye Li1 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.
Gerald Mullin6 HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University , New York, New York.
Linda Lee6 HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University , New York, New York.
Lisa Rohan7 Magee Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Peter A Anton8 UCLA Center for HIV Prevention Research, UCLA AIDS Institute , Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Craig W Hendrix1 Department of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Claude Ann Mellins · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
Regulatory compliance and human subjects safetyU19AI060614 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2004 to 2009
$19.1M
Clinical Pharmacology Training ProgramT32GM066691 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Michael Ippolito · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI 060614NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066691NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of HIV infection with tenofovir-containing regimens is effective, but plagued by poor adherence in some studies. Options for safe, effective, and acceptable PrEP products, especially for men and women at risk of HIV via receptive anal intercourse (RAI), are needed. We performed a randomized, partially blinded, first-in-human evaluation of four candidate rectal microbicide vehicles-aqueous gel, aqueous fluid, lipid gel, and lipid fluid-to select a prototype for further clinical development. Eight seronegative participants received three doses of each product with each dose separated by at least 2 weeks: one dose was given alone without simulated RAI in clinic, another dose was followed by simulated RAI in clinic, and another dose was self-administered at home in the context of RAI with a partner. Assessments included safety, acceptability, colon histology, ex vivo HIV infectivity of colon tissue explants, and colonic luminal distribution of vehicle and HIV surrogates. Adverse events were all mild and mainly sigmoidoscopy associated. There were minor differences in colon distribution of products and little effect of RAI. Vehicle distribution covered 95% (±7% standard deviation) of the distribution of an HIV surrogate in the colonic lumen. The lipid fluid vehicle increased HIV colon tissue infectability 5-fold [log10 p24 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.08, 1.28)] and aqueous gel provided 6-fold protection [log10 p24 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.20, 1.41)] compared to no product baseline. Colon permeability of lipid vehicles was more than 10-fold greater than aqueous vehicles. All products received similar acceptability ratings, though trends favored the gel products. Intensive simultaneous assessment of safety and toxicity, luminal and tissue distribution, ex vivo HIV infectivity, and product acceptability in relevant sexual contexts provided clear differentiation among candidate gels very early in product development. We selected the aqueous gel for further development as a rectal microbicide vehicle.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdministration, RectalAdultAnti-Infective AgentsColonCross-Over StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHistocytochemistryHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID26066390
PMCPMC4651043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.