Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26066014›Full record

ArticleNutrients2015

The Difference in Nutrient Intakes between Chinese and Mediterranean, Japanese and American Diets.

Ronghua Zhang, Zhaopin Wang, Ying Fei, Biao Zhou, Shuangshuang Zheng, Lijuan Wang, Lichun Huang, Shuying Jiang, Zeyu Liu, Jingxin Jiang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ronghua ZhangZhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China. rhzhang@cdc.zj.cn.
Zhaopin WangDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. zpwang7891@126.com.
Ying FeiDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. myhero33@zju.edu.cn.
Biao ZhouZhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China. bzhou@cdc.zj.cn.
Shuangshuang ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. shuangshuangzheng@163.com.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. wanglijuan890408@163.com.
Lichun HuangZhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China. lchhuang@cdc.zj.cn.
Shuying JiangDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. 783305906@qq.com.
Zeyu LiuDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. yuzeliu106@163.com.
Jingxin JiangDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. xiaoding5891@126.com.
Yunxian YuDepartment of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. yunxianyu@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNZhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across countries, the predominant diets are clearly different and highly related with human health. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate dietary nutrients between them. This study aimed to evaluate dietary nutrients in China and compare those between Chinese and Mediterranean (Italian), Japanese and American diets. Dietary intakes of 2659 subjects in south-east China, Zhejiang province, from 2010 to 2012, were estimated by three consecutive 24-h dietary recalls. The contribution of carbohydrate to total energy in Chinese subjects was lower than that in Japanese and American subjects, but higher than that in Italian subjects. However, the energy contribution from fat in Chinese subjects was higher than that in Japanese and American subjects, and similar to that in Italian subjects. Moreover, the Chinese diet had lower daily intakes of fiber, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, vitamin A, vitamin B1, vitamin B2 and vitamin C, compared with the Japanese, American and Italian diets. Nevertheless, intakes of sodium, iron, copper and vitamin E were higher among Chinese people relative to the people of other three countries. The present study demonstrated that the structure of the Chinese diet has been shifting away from the traditional diet toward high-fat, low-carbohydrate and low-fiber diets, and nutrients intakes in Chinese people have been changing even worse than those in American people.

Indexed as

DietEnergy IntakeAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolChinaDietary FiberDiet, MediterraneanDiet, WesternEthnicityFemaleHumansInfantItalyDietary FiberMicronutrientsAmerican dietChinese dietJapanese dietmacronutrientsMediterranean dietmicronutrientsnutrient intake

Identifiers

PMID26066014
PMCPMC4488807
OpenAlexW1577148670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.