ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2015
Land use/land cover water quality nexus: quantifying anthropogenic influences on surface water quality.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The multiscale nexus among land use-land cover changes and water quality in the Suquía River Basin, a semi-arid region of Argentina.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The impact of land use and socio-economic factors on ammonia nitrogen pollution in Weihe River watershed, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Water quality index and sanitary and socioeconomic indicators in Minas Gerais, Brazil.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Article
- Quantifying the connections-linkages between land-use and water in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2018Article
- Predicting nonpoint stormwater runoff quality from land use.PloS one · 2018Article
- Effects of land use types on dissolved trace metal concentrations in the Le'an River Basin, China.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2017Article
- Discharge permit market and farm management nexus: an approach for eutrophication control in small basins with low-income farmers.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic forces widely influence the composition, configuration, and trend of land use and land cover (LULC) changes with potential implications for surface water quality. These changes have the likelihood of generating non-point source pollution with additional environmental implications for terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Monitoring the scope and trajectory of LULC change is pivotal for region-wide planning, tracking the sustainability of natural resources, and meeting the information needs of policy makers. A good comprehension of the dynamics of anthropogenic drivers (proximate and underlying) that influence such changes in LULC is important because any potential adverse change in LULC that may be inimical to sustainable water quality might be addressed at the anthropogenic driver level rather than the LULC change stage. Using a dense time stack of Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper images, a hydrologic water quality and socio-geospatial modeling framework, this study quantifies the role of anthropogenic drivers of LULC change on total suspended solids and total phosphorus concentrations in the Lower Chippewa River Watershed, Wisconsin, at three time steps-1990, 2000, and 2010. Results of the study demonstrated that proximate drivers of LULC change accounted for between 32 and 59% of the concentration and spatial distribution of total suspended solids, while the extent of phosphorus impairment attributed to the proximate drivers ranged between 31 and 42%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26065891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.