ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2015
[Evaluation of a new residency program at the department of ophthalmology of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Approaches to promoting young talent in ophthalmology-support for clinical training within the specialist training program].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Leadership in ophthalmology training : Opportunities and risks of medical specialist education.Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- [Leadership in ophthalmology training : Opportunities and risks of medical specialist education].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Review
- Germany-wide evaluation of residency in neurological intensive care medicine.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- [The Homburger Curriculum as a model for medical resident education for ophthalmologists at Saarland University Medical Center].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe German ophthalmological training is still a very individually organized system with only one final oral examination at the end of the 5-year residency. At the beginning of 2013 a new residency program was introduced at the department of ophthalmology of the Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf. This study evaluated the resident satisfaction with the new concept. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe new residency program consists of three main changes: firstly a structured training with fixed rotation in the various subdisciplines of ophthalmology, secondly a list of practical skills examinations that has to be completed during the 5-year program and thirdly annual intermediate oral examinations. The satisfaction of the residents with the new program was anonymously evaluated with a Likert scale-based questionnaire with 15 items and additional free text comments.
results(1) The structured training was mostly rated positively and 9 out of 12 of residents favored a continuation of the training concept in this form. (2) Only 7 out of 11 residents (64 %) wanted to continue the practical skills examinations in this form and only approximately half of the residents saw a positive effect of these examinations. (3) Regarding the annual examinations 8 out of 11 residents (73 %) reported that the examinations helped them to assess their skills better, 91 % (10 out of 11) reported a learning motivation, 90 % (9 out of 10) an improvement in learning due to the examinations and 73 % (8 out of 11) were of the opinion that the examinations should take place regularly. DISCUSSION: The structured training and the annual examinations were positively evaluated. These changes could be effectively implemented even with a relatively small personnel structure. In comparison the practical skill examinations were rated relatively negatively, probably because of the further increase of daily work. The number of skills to be demonstrated is currently reduced and the integration of testing into the clinical routine of examiners and examinees is under revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26065527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.