Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064931›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Reflections on Addiction in Students Using Stimulants for Neuroenhancement: A Preliminary Interview Study.

Elisabeth Hildt, Klaus Lieb, Christiana Bagusat, Andreas G Franke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuroenhancement in French and Romanian University Students, Motivations and Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabeth HildtCenter for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3241 S. Federal Street, Chicago, IL 60616, USA ; Department of Philosophy, University of Mainz, Jakob Welder-Weg 18, 55099 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1314-5527
Klaus LiebDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Christiana BagusatDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6458-8013
Andreas G FrankeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany ; Department of Social Work and Education, University of Neubrandenburg, University of Applied Sciences, Brodaer Straße 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEIllinois Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of stimulants for the purpose of pharmacological neuroenhancement (NE) among students is a subject of increasing public awareness. The risk of addiction development by stimulant use for NE is still unanswered. Therefore, face-to-face interviews were carried out among 18 university students experienced in the nonmedical use of methylphenidate and amphetamines for NE assessing aspects of addiction. Interviews were tape-recorded, verbatim-transcribed, and analyzed using a qualitative approach. The interviews showed that participants--the majority had current or lifetime diagnoses of misuse or addiction to alcohol or cannabis-reported an awareness of the risk of addiction development associated with stimulant use and reported various effects which may increase their likelihood of future stimulant use, for example, euphoric effects, increase of self-confidence, and motivation. They also cited measures to counteract the development of addiction as well as measures taken to normalize again after stimulant use. Students were convinced of having control over their stimulant use and of not becoming addicted to stimulants used for NE. We can conclude that behavior and beliefs of the students in our sample appear to be risky in terms of addiction development. However, long-term empirical research is needed to estimate the true risk of addiction.

Indexed as

AdultAmphetaminesBehavior, AddictiveCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMethylphenidateStudentsSubstance-Related DisordersUniversitiesAmphetaminesCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID26064931
PMCPMC4433654
OpenAlexW2001689892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.