Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064899›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Novel Supportive Therapies for Oral Bone Regeneration.

Miguel Padial-Molina, Francisco O'Valle, Alejandro Lanis, Francisco Mesa, David M Dohan Ehrenfest, Hom-Lay Wang, Pablo Galindo-Moreno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Co-Culture Approaches in Cartilage and Bone Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Dental Pulp Stem Cell-Derived Secretome and Its Regenerative Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miguel Padial-MolinaDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA ; Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, 18009 Granada, Spain ; Research Group #CTS-583 (Implantology and Periodontics), University of Granada, Junta de Andalucía, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-1341
Francisco O'ValleDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18009 Granada, Spain ; Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), University of Granada, 18009 Granada, Spain ; Research Group #CTS-138 (Pathology), University of Granada, Junta de Andalucía, Spain.
Alejandro LanisDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA ; Private Practice, 8320000 Santiago, Chile ; Implantology Program, University of San Sebastian, 8320000 Santiago, Chile.
Francisco MesaResearch Group #CTS-583 (Implantology and Periodontics), University of Granada, Junta de Andalucía, Spain ; Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, 18009 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8293-2527
David M Dohan EhrenfestDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Hom-Lay WangDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Pablo Galindo-MorenoDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA ; Department of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, 18009 Granada, Spain ; Research Group #CTS-583 (Implantology and Periodontics), University of Granada, Junta de Andalucía, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone regeneration is often needed prior to dental implant treatment due to the lack of adequate quantity and quality of the bone after infectious diseases, trauma, tumor, or congenital conditions. In these situations, cell transplantation technologies may help to overcome the limitations of autografts, xenografts, allografts, and alloplastic materials. A database search was conducted to include human clinical trials (randomized or controlled) and case reports/series describing the clinical use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the oral cavity for bone regeneration only specifically excluding periodontal regeneration. Additionally, novel advances in related technologies are also described. 190 records were identified. 51 articles were selected for full-text assessment, and only 28 met the inclusion criteria: 9 case series, 10 case reports, and 9 randomized controlled clinical trials. Collectively, they evaluate the use of MSCs in a total of 290 patients in 342 interventions. The current published literature is very diverse in methodology and measurement of outcomes. Moreover, the clinical significance is limited. Therefore, the use of these techniques should be further studied in more challenging clinical scenarios with well-designed and standardized RCTs, potentially in combination with new scaffolding techniques and bioactive molecules to improve the final outcomes.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationBone TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAlveolar Bone LossAutograftsClinical Trials as TopicHeterograftsHumansMouth

Identifiers

PMID26064899
PMCPMC4443638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.