Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064692›Full record

SynthesisNeural plasticity2015

Functional and Structural Brain Plasticity Enhanced by Motor and Cognitive Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis.

Luca Prosperini, Maria Cristina Piattella, Costanza Giannì, Patrizia Pantano

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neural plasticity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive trajectories in multiple sclerosis: a long-term follow-up study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca ProsperiniDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Maria Cristina PiattellaDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Costanza GiannìDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-169X
Patrizia PantanoDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy ; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9659-8294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation is recognized to be important in ameliorating motor and cognitive functions, reducing disease burden, and improving quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In this systematic review, we summarize the existing evidences that motor and cognitive rehabilitation may enhance functional and structural brain plasticity in patients with MS, as assessed by means of the most advanced neuroimaging techniques, including diffusion tensor imaging and task-related and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In most cases, the rehabilitation program was based on computer-assisted/video game exercises performed in either an outpatient or home setting. Despite their heterogeneity, all the included studies describe changes in white matter microarchitecture, in task-related activation, and/or in functional connectivity following both task-oriented and selective training. When explored, relevant correlation between improved function and MRI-detected brain changes was often found, supporting the hypothesis that training-induced brain plasticity is specifically linked to the trained domain. Small sample sizes, lack of randomization and/or an active control group, as well as missed relationship between MRI-detected changes and clinical performance, are the major drawbacks of the selected studies. Knowledge gaps in this field of research are also discussed to provide a framework for future investigations.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityBrainBrain MappingCognitionDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisPsychomotor PerformanceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionVideo GamesWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID26064692
PMCPMC4438192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.