Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064666›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2015

A model for non-monotonic intensity coding.

Johannes Nehrkorn, Hiromu Tanimoto, Andreas V M Herz, Ayse Yarali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synapsin is required to "boost" memory strength for highly salient events.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes NehrkornDepartment of Biology II, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich and Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , Martinsried 82152, Germany ; Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology , Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Hiromu TanimotoMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology , Martinsried 82152, Germany ; Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences , Sendai 980-8577, Japan.
Andreas V M HerzDepartment of Biology II, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich and Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences , Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Ayse YaraliMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology , Martinsried 82152, Germany ; Research Group Molecular Systems Biology of Learning , Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology , Magdeburg 39118, Germany ; Center for Brain and Behavioural Sciences , Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral neurons of most sensory systems increase their response with increasing stimulus intensity. Behavioural responses, however, can be specific to some intermediate intensity level whose particular value might be innate or associatively learned. Learning such a preference requires an adjustable trans- formation from a monotonic stimulus representation at the sensory periphery to a non-monotonic representation for the motor command. How do neural systems accomplish this task? We tackle this general question focusing on odour-intensity learning in the fruit fly, whose first- and second-order olfactory neurons show monotonic stimulus-response curves. Nevertheless, flies form associative memories specific to particular trained odour intensities. Thus, downstream of the first two olfactory processing layers, odour intensity must be re-coded to enable intensity-specific associative learning. We present a minimal, feed-forward, three-layer circuit, which implements the required transformation by combining excitation, inhibition, and, as a decisive third element, homeostatic plasticity. Key features of this circuit motif are consistent with the known architecture and physiology of the fly olfactory system, whereas alternative mechanisms are either not composed of simple, scalable building blocks or not compatible with physiological observations. The simplicity of the circuit and the robustness of its function under parameter changes make this computational motif an attractive candidate for tuneable non-monotonic intensity coding.

Indexed as

associative learninghomeostatic plasticityneural codingolfactionstimulus intensity

Identifiers

PMID26064666
PMCPMC4453257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.