Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064663›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2015

The evolution of popular music: USA 1960-2010.

Matthias Mauch, Robert M MacCallum, Mark Levy, Armand M Leroi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of live music during chemotherapy in lymphoma patients: a randomized, controlled, multi-center trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What are patterns of rise and decline?Royal Society open science · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Modelling song popularity as a contagious process.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias MauchSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science , Queen Mary University of London , London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4352-6809
Robert M MacCallumDivision of Life Sciences , Imperial College London , London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Mark LevyLast.fm, 5-11 Lavingdon Street , London SE1 0NZ, UK.
Armand M LeroiDivision of Life Sciences , Imperial College London , London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern societies, cultural change seems ceaseless. The flux of fashion is especially obvious for popular music. While much has been written about the origin and evolution of pop, most claims about its history are anecdotal rather than scientific in nature. To rectify this, we investigate the US Billboard Hot 100 between 1960 and 2010. Using music information retrieval and text-mining tools, we analyse the musical properties of approximately 17 000 recordings that appeared in the charts and demonstrate quantitative trends in their harmonic and timbral properties. We then use these properties to produce an audio-based classification of musical styles and study the evolution of musical diversity and disparity, testing, and rejecting, several classical theories of cultural change. Finally, we investigate whether pop musical evolution has been gradual or punctuated. We show that, although pop music has evolved continuously, it did so with particular rapidity during three stylistic 'revolutions' around 1964, 1983 and 1991. We conclude by discussing how our study points the way to a quantitative science of cultural change.

Indexed as

cultural evolutiondiversitypopular musicstylistic revolutions

Identifiers

PMID26064663
PMCPMC4453253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.