Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064616›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2015

Social deprivation affects cooperative predator inspection in a cichlid fish.

Saskia Hesse, Jaime M Anaya-Rojas, Joachim G Frommen, Timo Thünken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Challenges of mismatching timescales in longitudinal studies of collective behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Saskia HesseInstitute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology , University of Bonn , An der Immenburg 1, Bonn 53121, Germany.
Jaime M Anaya-RojasInstitute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology , University of Bonn , An der Immenburg 1, Bonn 53121, Germany ; Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution , Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Seestraße 79 , Kastanienbaum 6047, Switzerland ; Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag Centre of Ecology , Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Seestraße 79 , Kastanienbaum 6047, Switzerland.
Joachim G FrommenDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Institute for Ecology and Evolution , University of Bern, Wohlenstr. 50a , Hinterkappelen 3032, Switzerland.
Timo ThünkenInstitute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology , University of Bonn , An der Immenburg 1, Bonn 53121, Germany ; Department of Behavioural Ecology, Institute for Ecology and Evolution , University of Bern, Wohlenstr. 50a , Hinterkappelen 3032, Switzerland.
University of Bonn · DESwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social environment individuals are exposed to during ontogeny shapes social skills and social competence in group-living animals. Consequently, social deprivation has serious effects on behaviour and development in animals but little is known about its impact on cooperation. In this study, we examined the effect of social environment on cooperative predator inspection. Predator inspection behaviour is a complex behaviour, which is present in a variety of shoaling fish species. Often, two fish leave the safety of the group and inspect a potentially dangerous predator in order to gather information about the current predation risk. As predator inspection is highly risky, it is prone to conflicts and cheating. However, cooperation among individuals may reduce the individual predation risk. We investigated this complex social behaviour in juveniles of the cichlid fish Pelvicachromis taeniatus that were reared in two different social environments throughout development. Fish reared in a group inspected more often than isolation-reared fish and were more likely to cooperate, i.e. they conducted conjoint inspection of a predator. By contrast, isolation-reared fish were more likely to perform a single inspection without a companion. These results suggest an impairment of cooperative behaviour in isolation-reared fish most probably due to lack of social experience and resulting in lowered social skills needed in coordinated behaviour.

Indexed as

cichlidscooperationpredator inspectionsocial environmentsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID26064616
PMCPMC4448828
OpenAlexW2013581581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.