ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Biomechanics analysis for the treatment of ischemic necrosis of the femoral head by using an interior supporting system.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy and Postoperative Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Internal Screw Fixation in Patients with Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis work aims to perform a biomechanical test to evaluate the effect of interior supporting system and tantalum rod in simulating the treatment of ischemic necrosis of the femoral head.
methodThree models were established: control group (group A), interior supporting system group (group B), and tantalum rod group (group C). Step-by-step loading was applied on the top of the femoral head until femoral head damage occurs by using the testing machine of the material test system. Strain and maximum load were applied until the femoral head collapses. The damage to the trochanteric fossa, femur calcar, and greater trochanter were compared.
results(1) The strain on the trochanteric fossa shows the following order: group C > group A and group B (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed among groups for the other parts (P > 0.05). (2) The maximum load in group B is larger than that in groups A and C (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the maximum load was observed among the three groups when the femoral head was destroyed.
conclusionsThe compression strain and bearing load of the femoral head are close to normal after placement of an interior supporting system and tantalum rod. The interior supporting system helps prevent femoral head collapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26064383PMC4443217W571655778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.