ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
A simple score for predicting renal artery stenosis in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis models to predict peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Renal artery revascularization using the inferior mesenteric artery as an inflow source with a long-term follow-up.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2021Article
- Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Syndrome Rather Than a Single Disease.The review of diabetic studies : RDSReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious risk score is not simple for predicting existence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS). Our study aims to develop a simple score to predict ARAS in eastern people with ischemic heart disease.
methodsThere were two data sources involved in this study. From the data source of patients with acute myocardial infarction, we developed a clinical score for predicting existence of ARAS. After this, we validated this clinical score in data source of patients with ischemic heart failure.
resultsBy multivariable logistic regression analysis, only age, hypertension, stroke or intermittent claudication, serum creatinine were involved in this model. Receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted. In the first data source, area under curve is 0.808 to predict ARAS, and 0.762 for bilateral ARAS. In the second data source, area under curve is 0.721 to predict ARAS, and 0.827 for ARAS. Cutoff value of 35.0 yields a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 51.0% for ARAS, a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 47.1% for bilateral ARAS. In the second data source, this cutoff value yields a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 30.5% for ARAS, a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 17.5% for bilateral ARAS.
conclusionsWe have developed a simple score for eastern people to predicting existence of ARAS with acceptable sensitivity and specificity in patients with ischemic heart disease. This score is still needed to be validated in general population or patients with no coronary heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26064346PMC4443180W2407948020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.