Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064255›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

CD44 family proteins in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and narrative review.

Ying Wu, Zhi Li, Chenlu Zhang, Kai Yu, Zan Teng, Guoliang Zheng, Shuang Wang, Yunpeng Liu, Lei Cui, Xiaosong Yu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer stem cells in human digestive tract malignancies.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ying WuDepartment of General Practice, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Zhi LiDepartment of Oncology, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Chenlu ZhangDepartment of Gerontology, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Kai YuDepartment of General Practice, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Zan TengDepartment of Oncology, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Guoliang ZhengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Shuang WangDepartment of General Practice, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Yunpeng LiuDepartment of Oncology, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Lei CuiDepartment of Information Management and Information System (Medicine), China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
Xiaosong YuDepartment of General Practice, The First Hospital, China Medical University Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China.
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a meta-analysis and narrative review, we evaluated the clinical and prognostic role of all CD44 family proteins in gastric cancer (GC). Literatures published up to August 2014 were searched on PubMed. Among the 37 eligible studies (6606 patients), 34 were included in meta-analysis, and 10 were subjected to narrative review. With meta-analysis, standard CD44 (CD44s) was demonstrated to predict reduced overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.58-2.34, PHR = 0.0222) and disease free survival (HR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.02-9.68, PHR = 0.0469), advanced N-stage (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.21, PRR = 0.0019), and distant metastasis (RR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.46-3.14, PRR < 0.0001) of GC. CD44 variant 6 (CD44v6) in GC might influence OS (5 studies; HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.75-2.14, PHR = 0.3783; 4 studies; HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.09-2.14, PHR = 0.0139), while significantly associated with N-stage (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48, PRR = 0.0240), M-stage (RR = 2.54, 95% CI: 1.08-6.00, PRR = 0.0333), TNM-stage (RR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.18-2.50, PRR = 0.0045), Lauren type (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.91, PRR = 0.0106), lymphatic invasion (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23, PRR = 0.0057), and liver metastasis (RR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.94-5.27, PRR < 0.0001) of the disease. Moreover, a narrative review was performed for CD44 isoforms, such as v3, v5, v7, v8-10, and v9, in GC. In conclusion, CD44s and CD44v6 as evaluated by immunohistochemistry, respectively, predicts the prognosis and disease severity of GC.

Indexed as

CD44sCD44 variantsgastric cancermeta-analysisnarrative reviewprognosis

Identifiers

PMID26064255
PMCPMC4443089
OpenAlexW2417736016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.