ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Brodalumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2017Pooled it
- Efficacy of Immunobiologic and Small Molecule Inhibitor Drugs for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Drugs in R&D · 2017Pooled it
- Anti-IL-17 therapy in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Rheumatology international · 2016Pooled it
- Role of innate lymphoid cells in chronic colitis during anti-IL-17A therapy.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Arthropathic psoriasis complicated by a paradoxical reaction in the form of erythrodermic psoriasis following adalimumab and by an allergic reaction following infliximab which was successfully managed with secukinumab.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2019Article
- Secukinumab: a review of the anti-IL-17A biologic for the treatment of psoriasis.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2018Review
- [A systematic review of anti-interleukin-17 antibody in the treatment of plaque psoriasis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2017Article
- Mechanistic rationales for targeting interleukin-17A in spondyloarthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2017Review
- Treatment challenges in the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis - role of secukinumab.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2016Review
- Quantitative evaluation to efficacy and safety of therapies for psoriasis: A network meta-analysis.Molecular painArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with high rate of recurrence. New anti-interleukin-17 (IL-17) and anti-IL17RA biologics are in Phase 3 clinical trials and may prove to be more effective than existing biologic drugs. Now we perform a meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In this meta-analysis, data analysis was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 3,213 psoriasis cases were included in the meta-analysis. Co-primary endpoints (week 12) were ≥ 75%/90% improvement in psoriasis area and a score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on a 5-point Investigator's Global Assessment scale (IGA mod 2011 0/1) versus placebo [1]. The overall efficacy in the meta-analysis was as follows: PASI 75: for secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo, fixed-effects OR = 49.25, 95% CI: 33.67-72.06, Z = 20.07, P < 0.00001; PASI 90: for secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo, fixed-effects OR = 44.92, 95% CI: 24.72-81.62, Z = 12.49, P < 0.00001; IGA mod 2011 0/1: for secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo, random-effects OR = 22.25, 95% CI: 7.63-64.84, Z = 5.68, P < 0.00001; Compared with placebo, there were no significant adverse effects in the secukinumab groups, demonstrating safety in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The proportion of patients who achieved 75%, 90% and IGA mod 2011 0/1 reductions respectively was significant in the secukinumab groups, demonstrating a rapid clinical improvement accompanied by a favorable short-term safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26064205PMC4443039W2408458962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.