Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064205›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hui-Zi Xiong, Jun-Ying Gu, Zhi-Gang He, Wen-Juan Chen, Xiao Zhang, Jia-Yi Wang, Yu-Ling Shi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [A systematic review of anti-interleukin-17 antibody in the treatment of plaque psoriasis].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui-Zi XiongDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China ; The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jun-Ying GuDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Zhi-Gang HeDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Wen-Juan ChenDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Jia-Yi WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Yu-Ling ShiDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine Shanghai 200072, China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with high rate of recurrence. New anti-interleukin-17 (IL-17) and anti-IL17RA biologics are in Phase 3 clinical trials and may prove to be more effective than existing biologic drugs. Now we perform a meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In this meta-analysis, data analysis was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 3,213 psoriasis cases were included in the meta-analysis. Co-primary endpoints (week 12) were ≥ 75%/90% improvement in psoriasis area and a score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on a 5-point Investigator's Global Assessment scale (IGA mod 2011 0/1) versus placebo [1]. The overall efficacy in the meta-analysis was as follows: PASI 75: for secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo, fixed-effects OR = 49.25, 95% CI: 33.67-72.06, Z = 20.07, P < 0.00001; PASI 90: for secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo, fixed-effects OR = 44.92, 95% CI: 24.72-81.62, Z = 12.49, P < 0.00001; IGA mod 2011 0/1: for secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo, random-effects OR = 22.25, 95% CI: 7.63-64.84, Z = 5.68, P < 0.00001; Compared with placebo, there were no significant adverse effects in the secukinumab groups, demonstrating safety in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The proportion of patients who achieved 75%, 90% and IGA mod 2011 0/1 reductions respectively was significant in the secukinumab groups, demonstrating a rapid clinical improvement accompanied by a favorable short-term safety profile.

Indexed as

meta-analysisPsoriasissecukinumab

Identifiers

PMID26064205
PMCPMC4443039
OpenAlexW2408458962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.