Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26064072›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2015

Clinical utility of exemestane in the treatment of breast cancer.

Giorgia Zucchini, Elena Geuna, Andrea Milani, Caterina Aversa, Rossella Martinello, Filippo Montemurro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Advances in Therapeutic Potential of Dual-Acting Aromatase/COX-2.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The therapeutic potential of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgia ZucchiniInvestigative Clinical Oncology, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia-Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCs), Candiolo, Italy.
Elena GeunaInvestigative Clinical Oncology, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia-Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCs), Candiolo, Italy.
Andrea MilaniInvestigative Clinical Oncology, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia-Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCs), Candiolo, Italy.
Caterina AversaUniversity of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Rossella MartinelloUniversity of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
Filippo MontemurroInvestigative Clinical Oncology, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia-Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCs), Candiolo, Italy.
Candiolo Cancer Institute · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women, causing a significant mortality worldwide. Different endocrine strategies are available for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, including antiestrogen tamoxifen and fulvestrant, as well as third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane. In this review, we will focus on exemestane, its clinical use, and its side effects. Exemestane is a steroidal third-generation AI now used in all treatment settings for breast cancer. In the metastatic disease, it has been extensively investigated as the first-, second-, and further-line treatment and it is now registered for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer whose disease has progressed following antiestrogen therapy. A potential lack of cross-resistance with nonsteroidal AIs has been described, giving additional therapeutic opportunities in sequences of endocrine agents. Exemestane is also approved for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal early breast cancer, either as upfront monotherapy for 5 years, as a switch following 2-3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended therapy beyond 5 years of adjuvant treatment. New promising data also showed a beneficial effect in young premenopausal early breast cancer patients, when administered together with ovarian suppression. Interesting results have also emerged when exemestane has been investigated as neodjuvant treatment as well as preventive agent in healthy women at high risk for breast cancer. Exemestane is generally well tolerated, with a side effect profile similar to that of other AIs, including menopausal symptoms, arthralgia, and bone loss. In conclusion, exemestane can be considered an effective and well-tolerated endocrine treatment option for all stages of breast cancer.

Indexed as

aromatase inhibitorsbreast cancerendocrine therapyexemestane

Identifiers

PMID26064072
PMCPMC4455847
OpenAlexW1565394077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.