Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063924›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

The phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles in essential tremor is associated with the relative strength of supraspinal and afferent input.

Juan A Gallego, Jakob L Dideriksen, Ales Holobar, Jaime Ibáñez, Vojko Glaser, Juan P Romero, Julián Benito-León, José L Pons, Eduardo Rocon, Dario Farina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. An Acute Randomized Controlled Trial of Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Essential Tremor.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2019
    Trial
  5. Defining the Rhythm: Developing a New Method to Describe Tremor and Myoclonus.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distribution of tremorogenic activity among the major superficial muscles of the upper limb in persons with Essential tremor.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Peripheral electrical stimulation to reduce pathological tremor: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Modulation of Neural and Muscular Adaptation Processes During Resistance Training by Fish Protein Ingestions in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Juan A GallegoNeural and Cognitive Engineering Group, Centre for Automation and Robotics, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28500 Arganda del Rey, Spain, Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2146-0703
Jakob L DideriksenDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Engineering, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Ales HolobarFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Jaime IbáñezNeural Rehabilitation Group, Cajal Institute, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28002 Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-151X
Vojko GlaserFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Juan P RomeroDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain, Biosanitary Sciencies School, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Julián Benito-LeónDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain, Department of Medicine, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain, and.
José L PonsNeural Rehabilitation Group, Cajal Institute, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28002 Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo RoconNeural and Cognitive Engineering Group, Centre for Automation and Robotics, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28500 Arganda del Rey, Spain, Post-Graduate Program, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 29075-910 Vitória, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-2176
Dario FarinaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Engineering, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, 37075 Göttingen, Germany, dario.farina@bccn.uni-goettingen.de.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Maribor · SICentre for Automation and Robotics · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto Cajal · ESNorthwestern University · USResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET), the most common movement disorder, is not fully understood. We investigated which factors determine the variability in the phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles, a long-standing observation yet unexplained. We used a computational model to simulate the effects of different levels of voluntary and tremulous synaptic input to antagonistic motoneuron pools on the tremor. We compared these simulations to data from 11 human ET patients. In both analyses, the neural drive to muscle was represented as the pooled spike trains of several motor units, which provides an accurate representation of the common synaptic input to motoneurons. The simulations showed that, for each voluntary input level, the phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles is determined by the relative strength of the supraspinal tremor input to the motoneuron pools. In addition, when the supraspinal tremor input to one muscle was weak or absent, Ia afferents provided significant common tremor input due to passive stretch. The simulations predicted that without a voluntary drive (rest tremor) the neural drives would be more likely in phase, while a concurrent voluntary input (postural tremor) would lead more frequently to an out-of-phase pattern. The experimental results matched these predictions, showing a significant change in phase difference between postural and rest tremor. They also indicated that the common tremor input is always shared by the antagonistic motoneuron pools, in agreement with the simulations. Our results highlight that the interplay between supraspinal input and spinal afferents is relevant for tremor generation.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAgedAnimalsComputer SimulationElectromyographyEssential TremorFemaleHumansMaleModels, BiologicalMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalSpinal CordStatistics, NonparametricSynapsesVibrissaeEMGessential tremorIa afferentsmotoneuronmotor unittremor

Identifiers

PMID26063924
PMCPMC6605200
OpenAlexW1893143467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.