Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063909›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Copula regression analysis of simultaneously recorded frontal eye field and inferotemporal spiking activity during object-based working memory.

Meng Hu, Kelsey L Clark, Xiajing Gong, Behrad Noudoost, Mingyao Li, Tirin Moore, Hualou Liang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Interactions between feedback and lateral connections in the primary visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-Degree Neurons Feed Cortical Computations.PLoS computational biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng HuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Kelsey L ClarkDepartment of Neurobiology and.
Xiajing GongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8329-0714
Behrad NoudoostDepartment of Neurobiology and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1588-027X
Mingyao LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Tirin MooreDepartment of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, and.
Hualou LiangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, hualou.liang@drexel.edu.
Drexel University · USInstitute of Neurobiology · BGHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR01EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2004 to 2024
$7.3M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR56EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2009 to 2009
$398k
NEI NIH HHS EY014924NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014924NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014924NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferotemporal (IT) neurons are known to exhibit persistent, stimulus-selective activity during the delay period of object-based working memory tasks. Frontal eye field (FEF) neurons show robust, spatially selective delay period activity during memory-guided saccade tasks. We present a copula regression paradigm to examine neural interaction of these two types of signals between areas IT and FEF of the monkey during a working memory task. This paradigm is based on copula models that can account for both marginal distribution over spiking activity of individual neurons within each area and joint distribution over ensemble activity of neurons between areas. Considering the popular GLMs as marginal models, we developed a general and flexible likelihood framework that uses the copula to integrate separate GLMs into a joint regression analysis. Such joint analysis essentially leads to a multivariate analog of the marginal GLM theory and hence efficient model estimation. In addition, we show that Granger causality between spike trains can be readily assessed via the likelihood ratio statistic. The performance of this method is validated by extensive simulations, and compared favorably to the widely used GLMs. When applied to spiking activity of simultaneously recorded FEF and IT neurons during working memory task, we observed significant Granger causality influence from FEF to IT, but not in the opposite direction, suggesting the role of the FEF in the selection and retention of visual information during working memory. The copula model has the potential to provide unique neurophysiological insights about network properties of the brain.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsElectric StimulationEye MovementsMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuronsPhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexProbability TheoryReaction TimeRegression AnalysisTemporal LobeVisual FieldsWakefulnesscopulageneralized linear modelneural data analysisspike trains

Identifiers

PMID26063909
PMCPMC4461683
OpenAlexW1677332013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.