Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063893›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2015

RNA Disruption and Drug Response in Breast Cancer Primary Systemic Therapy.

Kenneth Pritzker, Laura Pritzker, Daniele Generali, Alberto Bottini, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, Baoqing Guo, Amadeo Parissenti, Maureen Trudeau

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00066443 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase I/II Study Of Increasing Doses Of Epirubicin And Docetaxel Plus Pegfilgrastim For Locally Advanced Or Inflammatory Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNCIC Clinical Trials GroupRan2003 to 2014Enrolled93ConditionsBreast CancerArmspegfilgrastim, docetaxel, epirubicin hydrochloride
NCT03524430 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

RNA Disruption Assay (RDA)-Breast Cancer Response Evaluation for Individualized Therapy (BREVITY / BREVITY-02 in Germany)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRna Diagnostics Inc.Ran2018 to 2031Enrolled801ConditionsBreast Neoplasm FemaleArmsCore needle biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenneth PritzkerRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT). kpritzker@rnadiagnostics.com.
Laura PritzkerRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Daniele GeneraliRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Alberto BottiniRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Maria Rosa CappellettiRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Baoqing GuoRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Amadeo ParissentiRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Maureen TrudeauRna Diagnostics Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, LP, AP); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (KP, MT); Unita di Patologia Mammaria, Breasteast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitaieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG, AB, MRC); Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, Sudbury, ON, Canada (BG, AP); Laurentian University, Sudbury ON, Canada (AP); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (MT).
Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITUniversity of Toronto · CALaurentian University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs there is now evidence that switching clinical nonresponders early in primary systemic therapy to alternate treatment regimens can enhance survival in some breast cancer patients, the need for a robust intermediate endpoint that can guide treatment response across all tumor subtypes is urgent. Recently, chemotherapy drugs have been shown to induce a decrease in RNA quality in tumor cells from breast cancer biopsies in some patients at midtherapy, and that this has been associated with subsequent achievement of pathological complete response (pCR). The decrease in RNA quality has been shown to be associated with RNA disruption; aberrant RNA bands visualized by RNA electrophoresis have been associated with subsequent tumor cell death. The objectives of these studies are to show that a new assay based on induction of RNA disruption in tumor cells by chemotherapy can stratify at midtherapy, pCR responders from non-pCR responders irrespective of clinical response and to present early evidence that clinically useful RNA disruption can be detected as early as 14 days after initiation of treatment.

methodsRNA disruption in tumor cells was quantified by analysis of the RNA electrophoresis banding pattern and expressed as an RNA disruption index (RDI). To develop the RNA disruption assay (RDA), RDI was correlated with clinical outcome (pCR) from the NCIC-CTG MA.22 breast cancer clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00066443). RDA Zones were established by stratifying patients using RDI values into Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3. Zone 3 included seven out of eight pCR responders, whereas Zone 1 contained no pCR responders. An intermediate zone (Zone 2) was established which contained one pCR. Subsequently, to determine early drug response, RNA disruption was examined by RDI after 14 days exposure to trastuzumab, zoledronic acid, or letrozole + cyclophosphamide ± sorafenib therapy.

resultsIn MA.22, RDA stratified 23 of 85 patients in Zone 1 as pCR nonresponders, 24 patients in Zone 2, an intermediate zone, and 38 patients in Zone 3, pCR responders and non-pCR patients who share RDI comparable to those achieving pCR. In the early response studies, after 14 days exposure to chemotherapy, some RNA disruption as measured by RDI elevation could be detected in 3/12 trastuzumab, 7/15 zoledronic acid, 5/29 letrozole + cyclophosphamide, and 5/23 letrozole + cyclophosphamide + sorafenib patients.

conclusionsRDA is a novel intermediate endpoint that has promise for clinical utility for breast cancers early in response-guided primary systemic therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalElectrophoresis, CapillaryFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRemission InductionRNA, NeoplasmRNA StabilityTreatment OutcomeRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID26063893
OpenAlexW2275709532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.