Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063845›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Ants adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors.

Tomer J Czaczkes, Jürgen Heinze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ontogeny of collective behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Social structure of perennialEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomer J CzaczkesBiologie I, Universität Regensburg, Universitätstrasse 31, Regensburg 93053, Germany tomer.czaczkes@biologie.uni-regensburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1350-4975
Jürgen HeinzeBiologie I, Universität Regensburg, Universitätstrasse 31, Regensburg 93053, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals must contend with an ever-changing environment. Social animals, especially eusocial insects such as ants and bees, rely heavily on communication for their success. However, in a changing environment, communicated information can become rapidly outdated. This is a particular problem for pheromone trail using ants, as once deposited pheromones cannot be removed. Here, we study the response of ant foragers to an environmental change. Ants were trained to one feeder location, and the feeder was then moved to a different location. We found that ants responded to an environmental change by strongly upregulating pheromone deposition immediately after experiencing the change. This may help maintain the colony's foraging flexibility, and allow multiple food locations to be exploited simultaneously. Our treatment also caused uncertainty in the foragers, by making their memories less reliable. Ants which had made an error but eventually found the food source upregulated pheromone deposition when returning to the nest. Intriguingly, ants on their way towards the food source downregulated pheromone deposition if they were going to make an error. This may suggest that individual ants can measure the reliability of their own memories and respond appropriately.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsFeeding BehaviorPheromonesProbabilityUncertaintyUp-RegulationPheromonesenvironmental uncertaintyLasius nigermemorymetacognitionmetamemorypheromone trails

Identifiers

PMID26063845
PMCPMC4590477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.