Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063764›Full record

Trial reportMolecular cancer therapeutics2015

Pilot Trial of Selecting Molecularly Guided Therapy for Patients with Non-V600 BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Melanoma: Experience of the SU2C/MRA Melanoma Dream Team.

Patricia M LoRusso, Scott A Boerner, Mary Jo Pilat, Karen M Forman, Clarice Y Zuccaro, Jeffrey A Kiefer, Winnie S Liang, Sally Hunsberger, Bruce G Redman, Svetomir N Markovic and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strategies for Testing Intervention Matching Schemes in Cancer.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Precision Oncology Decision Support: Current Approaches and Strategies for the Future.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The evidence framework for precision cancer medicine.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018
    Review
  14. Prospective Feasibility Trial for Genomics-Informed Treatment in Recurrent and Progressive Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Precision medicine: an opportunity for a paradigm shift in veterinary medicine.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia M LoRussoYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. patricia.lorusso@yale.edu.
Scott A BoernerYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Mary Jo PilatBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Karen M FormanYale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Clarice Y ZuccaroBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Jeffrey A KieferTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Winnie S LiangTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Sally HunsbergerBiometrics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Bruce G RedmanUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMCCC), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Svetomir N MarkovicMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Aleksandar SekulicMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Alan H BryceMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Richard W JosephMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
C Lance CoweyCharles A. Sammons Cancer Center/Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Leslie Anne FecherUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMCCC), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jeffrey Alan SosmanVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Paul B ChapmanMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Gary K SchwartzColumbia University, New York, New York.
David W CraigTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
John D CarptenTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jeffrey M TrentTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USYale Cancer Center · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have led to significant improvements in the treatment of advanced cancers, including metastatic melanoma. However, new strategies are desperately needed to overcome therapeutic resistance to these agents, as well as to identify effective treatment approaches for cancer patients that fall outside major targetable mutational subtypes (e.g., non-V600 BRAF melanoma). One such strategy is to extend the paradigm of individually tailored, molecularly targeted therapy into a broader spectrum of melanoma patients, particularly those bearing tumors without commonly recognized therapeutic targets, as well as having failed or were ineligible for immunotherapy. In this nontreatment pilot study, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies were utilized, including whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing, to identify molecular aberrations in patients with non-V600 BRAF metastatic melanoma. This information was then rationally matched to an appropriate clinical treatment from a defined pharmacopeia. Five patients with advanced non-V600 BRAF metastatic melanoma were enrolled. We demonstrated successful performance of the following during a clinically relevant time period: patient tumor biopsy, quality DNA/RNA extraction, DNA/RNA-based sequencing for gene expression analysis, analysis utilizing a series of data integration methodologies, report generation, and tumor board review with formulated treatment plan. Streamlining measures were conducted based on the experiences of enrolling, collecting specimens, and analyzing the molecular signatures of patients. We demonstrated the feasibility of using NGS to identify molecular aberrations and generate an individualized treatment plan in this patient population. A randomized treatment study utilizing lessons learned from the conduct of this pilot study is currently underway.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyMutationAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPhenotypePilot ProjectsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID26063764
PMCPMC5560131
OpenAlexW2126361538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.