ReviewInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2015
Physiologic imaging in acute stroke: Patient selection.
Review in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship of ASPECTS Lesion Topography with Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanical thrombectomy for cerebrovascular occlusion in a patient with situs inversus.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Portable, low-field magnetic resonance imaging enables highly accessible and dynamic bedside evaluation of ischemic stroke.Science advances · 2022Article
- Portable, bedside, low-field magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of intracerebral hemorrhage.Nature communications · 2021Observational
- PET Detection of Cerebral Necrosis Using an Infarct-Avid Agent 2-Deoxy-2-[Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Liquid biopsy markers for stroke diagnosis.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020Review
- Imaging of acute ischemic stroke.Emergency radiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of acute stroke is changing, as endovascular intervention becomes an important adjunct to tissue plasminogen activator. An increasing number of sophisticated physiologic imaging techniques have unique advantages and applications in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment-decision making of acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we first highlight the strengths, weaknesses, and possible indications for various stroke imaging techniques. How acute imaging findings in each modality have been used to predict functional outcome is discussed. Furthermore, there is an increasing emphasis on using these state-of-the-art imaging modalities to offer maximal patient benefit through IV therapy, endovascular thrombolytics, and clot retrieval. We review the burgeoning literature in the determination of stroke treatment based on acute, physiologic imaging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.