Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063548›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015

Holmium laser excision for urinary mesh erosion: a minimally invasive treatment with favorable long-term results.

Christina A Ogle, Brian J Linder, Daniel S Elliott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of iatrogenic urethral foreign body after mid-urethral sling A literature review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina A OgleDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Brian J LinderDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Daniel S ElliottDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. elliott.daniel@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisMesh erosion into the urinary tract following surgery for stress urinary incontinence is a potentially serious complication. Traditional open resection is complicated and potentially morbid. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the long-term patient outcomes following transurethral endoscopic excision using the holmium laser (TEEH).

methodsA retrospective series of ten patients who had undergone TEEH at our institution between May 2011 and July 2014 were identified. Nine had a prior urethral sling placed, and one had suture erosion following a Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure. Outcomes assessed included resolution of symptoms, successful treatment of exposed mesh on repeat cystoscopy, and recurrence of stress urinary incontinence. Patients were followed up through office examination, cystoscopy and/or through written or telephone correspondence.

resultsThe median age of the patients at the time of surgery was 58 years (IQR 54 - 66 years). The median time from anti-incontinence surgery to onset of symptoms was 12 months (IQR 1 - 72 months). Patients with mesh erosion most commonly presented with irritative voiding symptoms (60%). The median follow-up was 27 months (IQR 14 - 32 months) with 80% of patients reporting symptomatic improvement. Eight patients underwent follow-up cystoscopy with anatomic success (resolution of erosion on cystoscopy) after one procedure in five patients (63%). The anatomic success rate was higher for bladder erosions than for urethral erosions (80% vs. 33%). Notably, three patients experienced recurrent stress urinary incontinence following TEEH, with one patient undergoing repeat anti-incontinence surgery.

conclusionsTEEH is a viable, minimally invasive option for management of urinary mesh erosions. Notably, there is a risk of recurrent stress urinary incontinence following laser mesh excision.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansLasers, Solid-StateMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressAnti-incontinenceComplicationsLaserMesh

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.