Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063223›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2015

Considerations in the Use of Nonhuman Primate Models of Ebola Virus and Marburg Virus Infection.

Thomas W Geisbert, James E Strong, Heinz Feldmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A Single-Dose Bundibugyo Virus Vaccine Protects Macaques Within 3 Days.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Ebola virus matrix protein VP40 triggers inflammatory responses linked to the ebolavirus virulence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluating Countermeasures Against Marburg Virus Using a Mouse Model.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas W GeisbertGalveston National Laboratory Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
James E StrongSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada Department of Medical Microbiology Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Heinz FeldmannLaboratory of Virology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers: Disease Modeling and TransmissionZIAAI001089 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI FELDMANN, HEINRICH · 2009 to 2025
$50.7M
CAP: Trivalent Filovirus Vaccine for Pre- and Post-Exposure VaccinationZIAAI001163 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI FELDMANN, HEINRICH · 2012 to 2019
$3.9M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The filoviruses, Ebola virus and Marburg virus, are zoonotic pathogens that cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs), with case-fatality rates ranging from 23% to 90%. The current outbreak of Ebola virus infection in West Africa, with >26 000 cases, demonstrates the long-underestimated public health danger that filoviruses pose as natural human pathogens. Currently, there are no vaccines or treatments licensed for human use. Licensure of any medical countermeasure may require demonstration of efficacy in the gold standard cynomolgus or rhesus macaque models of filovirus infection. Substantial progress has been made over the last decade in characterizing the filovirus NHP models. However, there is considerable debate over a variety of experimental conditions, including differences among filovirus isolates used, routes and doses of exposure, and euthanasia criteria, all of which may contribute to variability of results among different laboratories. As an example of the importance of understanding these differences, recent data with Ebola virus shows that an addition of a single uridine residue in the glycoprotein gene at the editing site attenuates the virus. Here, we draw on decades of experience working with filovirus-infected NHPs to provide a perspective on the importance of various experimental conditions.

Indexed as

Africa, WesternAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDisease OutbreaksEbolavirusGlycoproteinsHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMacaca fascicularisMacaca mulattaMarburgvirusMarburg Virus DiseasePrimatesVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesGlycoproteinsVaccines, AttenuatedViral Vaccinesanimal modelEbola virusfilovirusMarburg virusnonhuman primatetreatmentvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26063223
PMCPMC4564553
OpenAlexW2108356414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.