Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063216›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Impregnating hessian strips with the volatile pyrethroid transfluthrin prevents outdoor exposure to vectors of malaria and lymphatic filariasis in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Nicodem J Govella, Sheila B Ogoma, John Paliga, Prosper P Chaki, Gerry Killeen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicodem J GovellaIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Coordination Office, P.O Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. govella@ihi.or.tz.
Sheila B OgomaIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Coordination Office, P.O Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. sogoma@ihi.or.tz.
John PaligaIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Coordination Office, P.O Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. jpaliga@ihi.or.tz.
Prosper P ChakiIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Coordination Office, P.O Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. govella@ihi.or.tz.
Gerry KilleenIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Coordination Office, P.O Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. gkilleen@ihi.or.tz.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102368/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSemi-field trials using laboratory-reared Anopheles arabiensis have shown that, delivering the volatile pyrethroid transfluthrin by absorption into hessian strips, consistently provided > 99% human protective efficacy against bites for 6 months without retreating. Here the impact of this approach upon human exposure to wild populations of vectors for both malaria and filariasis under full field conditions is assessed for the first time.

methodsTransfluthrin-treated and untreated strips were placed around human volunteers conducting human landing catch in an outdoor environment in urban Dar es Salaam, where much human exposure to malaria and filariasis transmission occurs outdoors. The experiment was replicated 9 times at 16 outdoor catching stations in 4 distinct locations over 72 working nights between May and August 2012.

resultsOverall, the treated hessian strips conferred 99% protection against An. gambiae (1 bite versus 159) and 92% protection against Culex spp. (1478 bites versus 18,602). No decline in efficacy over the course of the study could be detected for the very sparse populations of An. gambiae (P = 0.32) and only a slow efficacy decline was observed for Culex spp. (P < 0.001), with protection remaining satisfactory over 3 months after strip treatment. Diversion of mosquitoes to unprotected humans in nearby houses was neither detected for An. gambiae (P = 0.152) nor for Culex spp. (Relative rate, [95% CI] = 1.03, [0.95, 1.11], P = 0.499).

conclusionWhile this study raises more questions than it answers, the presented evidence of high protection over long periods suggest this technology may have potential for preventing outdoor transmission of malaria, lymphatic filariasis and other vector-borne pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesCulexCyclopropanesElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleFluorobenzenesHumansInsecticidesMalariaMaleMosquito ControlPyrethrinsTanzaniaCyclopropanesFluorobenzenesInsecticidesPyrethrinstransfluthrin

Identifiers

PMID26063216
PMCPMC4465323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.