Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063179›Full record

Observational studyBMC urology2015

Treatment by a nurse practitioner in primary care improves the severity and impact of urinary incontinence in women. An observational study.

Doreth T A M Teunissen, Marjolein M Stegeman, Hans H Bor, Toine A L M Lagro-Janssen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Doreth T A M TeunissenDepartment Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Internal postal code 118, P.O. Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. doreth.teunissen@radboudumc.nl.
Marjolein M StegemanDepartment Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Internal postal code 118, P.O. Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. stegemanmarjolein@hotmail.com.
Hans H BorDepartment Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Internal postal code 118, P.O. Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Hans.Bor@radboudumc.nl.
Toine A L M Lagro-JanssenDepartment Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Internal postal code 118, P.O. Box 9101, , 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Toine.lagro-janssen@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary Incontinence (UI) is a common problem in women. The management of UI in primary care is time consuming and suboptimal. Shift of incontinence-care from General Practitioners (GP's) to a nurse practitioner maybe improves the quality of care. The purpose of this observational (pre/post) study is to determine the effectiveness of introducing a nurse practitioner in UI care and to explore women's reasons for not completing treatment.

methodsSixteen trained nurse practitioners treated female patients with UI. All patients were examined and referred by the GP to the nurse practitioner working in the same practice. At baseline the severity of the UI (Sandvik-score), the impact on the quality of life (IIQ) and the impressed severity (PGIS) was measured and repeated after three months Differences were tested by the paired t and the NcNemar test. Reasons for not completing treatment were documented by the nurse practitioner and differences between the group that completed treatment and the drop-out group were tested.

resultsWe included 103 women, mean age 55 years (SD 12.6). The Sandvik severity categories improved significantly (P < 0.001), as did the impact on daily life (2.54 points, P = 0.012). Among the IIQ score the impact on daily activities increased 0.73 points (P = 0.032), on social functioning 0.60 points (P = 0.030) and on emotional well-being 0.63 points (P = 0.031). The PGIS-score improved in 41.3% of the patients. The most important reasons for not completing the treatment were lack of improvement of the UI and difficulties in performing the exercises. Women who withdraw from guidance by the nurse practitioner perceived more impact on daily life (P = 0.036), in particular on the scores for social functioning (P = 0.015) and emotional well-being (P = 0.015).

conclusionTreatment by a trained nurse practitioner seems positively affects the severity of the UI and the impact on the quality of life. Women who did not complete treatment suffer from more impact on quality of life, experience not enough improvement and mention difficulties in performing exercises.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersQuality of LifeWomen's HealthExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPrimary Care NursingSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID26063179
PMCPMC4464223
OpenAlexW1570169476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.