Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063055›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

A multicentre retrospective review of muscle necrosis of the leg following spinal surgery with motor evoked potential monitoring: a cause for concern?

Kiran G Divani, Andrew O'Brien, Sean Molloy, Jayesh Trivedi, Joseph Cowan, Alexander Gibson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiran G DivaniSpinal Deformity Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK. divanik@doctors.org.uk.
Andrew O'BrienSpinal Deformity Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK.
Sean MolloySpinal Deformity Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK.
Jayesh TrivediRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, Shropshire, UK.
Joseph CowanSpinal Deformity Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK.
Alexander GibsonSpinal Deformity Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH), Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are very few reported cases of compartment syndrome of the leg following spinal surgery via a posterior approach. An association between compartment syndrome and muscle over-activity via nerve stimulation during evoked potential monitoring was first suggested in 2003. No further reports have suggested this link. We present a multicentre retrospective review of a series of five patients who developed compartment syndrome of the leg following spinal surgery via a posterior approach, whilst un-paralysed and with combined sensory (SSEP)/motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring with an aim of highlighting this possible causative factor.

methodsAll data were collected contemporaneously and retrospective analysis was performed. We then arranged for a multidisciplinary review of the cases including surgeons, anaesthetists, radiologists, neurophysiologists and theatre and ward nursing staff. Finally, the literature was reviewed.

resultsAll patients were operated on by three different surgeons, on different operating tables/mattresses in the prone position. The common factors were un-paralysed patients having motor/sensory monitoring, mechanical calf pumps and total intravenous anaesthesia. Three patients underwent surgical decompression of their compartments and two were treated expectantly. Three patients had confirmed intra-compartmental changes on MRI consistent with compartment syndrome and one had intra-compartmental pressure monitoring which confirmed the diagnosis.

conclusionsPrevious cases in the literature have related to mal-positioning on the Jackson table or use of the knee-chest position for surgery. This was not the case for our patients; therefore, we suspect an association between overactive muscle stimulation and muscle necrosis. Further experimental studies investigating this link are required.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnesthesia, GeneralChondrosarcomaCompartment SyndromesEvoked Potentials, MotorEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeMuscle, SkeletalNecrosisNeurosurgical ProceduresPatient PositioningCompartment syndromeSpinal cord monitoringSpinal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.