Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26063054›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Spinal pain--good sleep matters: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Kari Paanalahti, Maria M Wertli, Ulrike Held, Torbjörn Åkerstedt, Lena W Holm, Margareta Nordin, Eva Skillgate

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2016.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kari PaanalahtiInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden. kari.paanalahti@ki.se.
Maria M WertliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Horten Center for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulrike HeldDepartment of Internal Medicine, Horten Center for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Torbjörn ÅkerstedtInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena W HolmInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Margareta NordinInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva SkillgateInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Zurich · CHStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe estimated prevalence of poor sleep in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain is estimated to 64% in the adult population. The annual cost for musculoskeletal pain and reported poor sleep is estimated to be billions of dollars annually in the US. The aim of this cohort study with one-year follow-up was to explore the role of impaired sleep with daytime consequence on the prognosis of non-specific neck and/or back pain.

methodsSecondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, including 409 patients.

resultsPatients with good sleep at baseline were more likely to experience a minimal clinically important difference in pain [OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.22-3.38)] and disability [OR 1.85 (95% CI 1.04-3.30)] compared to patients with impaired sleep at one-year follow-up.

conclusionPatients with non-specific neck and/or back pain and self-reported good sleep are more likely to experience a minimal clinically important difference in pain and disability compared to patients with impaired sleep with daytime consequence.

Indexed as

AdultBack PainCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal ManipulationsNeck PainPain MeasurementPrognosisSleep Wake DisordersTreatment OutcomeBack painImpaired sleepNaprapathyNeck painSpinal pain

Identifiers

PMID26063054
OpenAlexW581265426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.