Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26062928›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2015

Phase II study of saracatinib (AZD0530) in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.

S M Reddy, S Kopetz, J Morris, N Parikh, W Qiao, M J Overman, D Fogelman, I Shureiqi, C Jacobs, Z Malik and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dual Drug Repurposing: The Example of Saracatinib.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

S M ReddyHematology-Oncology Fellow, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 463, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, smreddy1@mdanderson.org.
S Kopetz
J Morris
N Parikh
W Qiao
M J Overman
D Fogelman
I Shureiqi
C Jacobs
Z Malik
C A Jimenez
R A Wolff
J L Abbruzzese
G Gallick
C Eng
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDuke Medical Center · USNorton Healthcare · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672PHS HHS NSC735464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSrc has a critical role in tumor cell migration and invasion. Increased Src activity has been shown to correlate with disease progression and poor prognosis, suggesting Src could serve as a therapeutic target for kinase inhibition. Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a novel selective oral Src kinase inhibitor.

methodsMetastatic colorectal cancer patients who had received one prior treatment and had measurable disease were enrolled in this phase 2 study. Saracatinib was administered at 175 mg by mouth daily for 28 day cycles until dose-limiting toxicity or progression as determined by staging every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was improvement in 4 month progression-free survival. Design of Thall, Simon, and Estey was used to monitor proportion of patients that were progression free at 4 months. The trial was opened with plan to enroll maximum of 35 patients, with futility assessment every 10 patients.

resultsA total of 10 patients were enrolled between January and November 2007. Further enrollment was stopped due to futility. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 weeks, with all 10 patients showing disease progression following radiographic imaging. Median overall survival was 13.5 months. All patients were deceased by time of analysis. Observed adverse events were notable for a higher than expected number of patients with grade 3 hypophosphatemia (n = 5).

conclusionSaracatinib is a novel oral Src kinase inhibitor that was well tolerated but failed to meet its primary endpoint of improvement in 4 month progression-free survival as a single agent in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinessrc-Family KinasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinessaracatinibsrc-Family KinasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26062928
OpenAlexW580030752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.