Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26062912›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Satisfaction of clients with the services of an outpatient pharmacy at a university hospital in northwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Abdrrahman Shemsu Surur, Fitsum Sebsibe Teni, Genet Girmay, Elsabet Moges, Meseret Tesfa, Messele Abraha

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmacist-led Medication Counseling for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Path to Better Adherence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdrrahman Shemsu SururDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. lowerurexpect@gmail.com.
Fitsum Sebsibe TeniDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. fitse4@gmail.com.
Genet GirmayDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. gen.girmay@gmail.com.
Elsabet MogesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. elsabetmoges@hotmail.com.
Meseret TesfaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. meserettesfa@hotmail.com.
Messele AbrahaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. mes.abraha@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of patient/client satisfaction with pharmacy services as a crucial part of the health services through appropriate studies is important. This will help identify specific areas of the service which need improvement in realizing high quality pharmacy services in general and enhance the positive changes in the current pharmaceutical services provision in Ethiopia. The current study aimed at assessing the level of client satisfaction with the services of the outpatient pharmacy of Gondar University Referral Hospital (GURH) in northwestern Ethiopia.

methodsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted involving 400 clients who had prescriptions/orders filled at the outpatient pharmacy of the hospital during the period of 5th to 25th of November 2013. The data on the level of satisfaction of clients with the services of the outpatient pharmacy in the hospital was collected using a structured interview guide adopted from an instrument translated into Amharic and validated. The data collected was entered into and analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.

resultsThe overall mean score the respondents gave to satisfaction with the pharmaceutical services was 2.48 out of a maximum of 5.00 score. The mean scores for all the individual parameters rated were less than 3.00. Maximum mean scores were given for parameters asking about the promptness of prescription medication service (2.99), and professionalism of the pharmacy staff (2.96) with the lowest being scored for information given to clients about the storage of medication (1.25), and explanations of possible side effects (1.27). Clients who were served free of fee recorded significantly higher level of satisfaction than those who paid. Higher levels of satisfaction were also reported among illiterates, older adults and those with no job compared to those with higher education, merchants and government employees.

conclusionsThis study showed that the overall mean satisfaction level of clients of the outpatient pharmacy was low and it differed among different socio-demographic characteristics. Further research in to the reasons behind the low satisfaction should be done to provide appropriate solutions to improve the service.

Indexed as

Prescription DrugsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPatient SatisfactionPharmaciesSocioeconomic FactorsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26062912
PMCPMC4464722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.