Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26062794›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2015

LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition.

Darko Katić, Chantal Julliard, Anna-Laura Wekerle, Hannes Kenngott, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Rüdiger Dillmann, Stefanie Speidel, Pierre Jannin, Bernard Gibaud

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Action classification for endoscopic pituitary adenoma resection: a consensus-based study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TRandAugment: temporal random augmentation strategy for surgical activity recognition from videos.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Novel evaluation of surgical activity recognition models using task-based efficiency metrics.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. "Deep-Onto" network for surgical workflow and context recognition.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  18. Toward a standard ontology of surgical process models.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  19. The intelligent OR: design and validation of a context-aware surgical working environment.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  20. Paradigm shift: cognitive surgery.Innovative surgical sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Darko KatićKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Adenauerring 2, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany, katic@kit.edu.
Chantal Julliard
Anna-Laura Wekerle
Hannes Kenngott
Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Rüdiger Dillmann
Stefanie Speidel
Pierre Jannin
Bernard Gibaud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe rise of intraoperative information threatens to outpace our abilities to process it. Context-aware systems, filtering information to automatically adapt to the current needs of the surgeon, are necessary to fully profit from computerized surgery. To attain context awareness, representation of medical knowledge is crucial. However, most existing systems do not represent knowledge in a reusable way, hindering also reuse of data. Our purpose is therefore to make our computational models of medical knowledge sharable, extensible and interoperational with established knowledge representations in the form of the LapOntoSPM ontology. To show its usefulness, we apply it to situation interpretation, i.e., the recognition of surgical phases based on surgical activities.

methodsConsidering best practices in ontology engineering and building on our ontology for laparoscopy, we formalized the workflow of laparoscopic adrenalectomies, cholecystectomies and pancreatic resections in the framework of OntoSPM, a new standard for surgical process models. Furthermore, we provide a rule-based situation interpretation algorithm based on SQWRL to recognize surgical phases using the ontology.

resultsThe system was evaluated on ground-truth data from 19 manually annotated surgeries. The aim was to show that the phase recognition capabilities are equal to a specialized solution. The recognition rates of the new system were equal to the specialized one. However, the time needed to interpret a situation rose from 0.5 to 1.8 s on average which is still viable for practical application.

conclusionWe successfully integrated medical knowledge for laparoscopic surgeries into OntoSPM, facilitating knowledge and data sharing. This is especially important for reproducibility of results and unbiased comparison of recognition algorithms. The associated recognition algorithm was adapted to the new representation without any loss of classification power. The work is an important step to standardized knowledge and data representation in the field on context awareness and thus toward unified benchmark data sets.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyAlgorithmsCholecystectomyComputer SimulationEquipment DesignHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntraoperative PeriodLaparoscopyModels, AnatomicPancreasReproducibility of ResultsSurgery, Computer-AssistedWorkflow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.