Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26062723›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Serological and molecular analysis of feline vector-borne anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis using species-specific peptides and PCR.

Barbara C Hegarty, Barbara A Qurollo, Brittany Thomas, Karen Park, Ramaswamy Chandrashekar, Melissa J Beall, Brendon Thatcher, Edward B Breitschwerdt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DETECTION OF VECTOR-BORNE INFECTIONS IN LIONS AND TIGERS AT TWO ZOOS IN TENNESSEE AND OKLAHOMA, USA.Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence ofJFMS open reports
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara C HegartyIntracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), 1060 William Moore Dr., Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. barbara_hegarty@ncsu.edu.
Barbara A QurolloIntracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), 1060 William Moore Dr., Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. baquroll@ncsu.edu.
Brittany ThomasIntracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), 1060 William Moore Dr., Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. bmsherbe@ncsu.edu.
Karen ParkIntracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), 1060 William Moore Dr., Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. kmpark2@ncsu.edu.
Ramaswamy ChandrashekarIDEXX Laboratories, Inc, Westbrook, ME, USA. Chandrashekar-Ramaswamy@idexx.com.
Melissa J BeallIDEXX Laboratories, Inc, Westbrook, ME, USA. Melissa-Beall@idexx.com.
Brendon ThatcherIDEXX Laboratories, Inc, Westbrook, ME, USA. Brendon-Thatcher@idexx.com.
Edward B BreitschwerdtIntracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU), 1060 William Moore Dr., Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. ed_breitschwerdt@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USIDEXX Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the exception of Bartonella spp. or Cytauxzoon felis, feline vector-borne pathogens (FVBP) have been less frequently studied in North America and are generally under-appreciated as a clinical entity in cats, as compared to dogs or people. This study investigated selected FVBP seroreactivity and PCR prevalence in cats using archived samples.

methodsFeline blood samples submitted to the Vector Borne Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory (VBDDL) at North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine (NCSU-CVM) between 2008 and 2013 were tested using serological assays and PCR. An experimental SNAP® Multi-Analyte Assay (SNAP® M-A) (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Westbrook, Maine, USA) was used to screen all sera for antibodies to Anaplasma and Ehrlichia genus peptides and A. phagocytophilum, A. platys, B. burgdorferi, E. canis, E. chaffeensis, and E. ewingii species-specific peptides. PCR assays were used to amplify Anaplasma or Ehrlichia DNA from extracted ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-anti-coagulated blood samples. Amplicons were sequenced to identify species.

resultsOverall, 7.8% (56/715) of cats were FVBP seroreactive and 3.2% (13/406) contained Anaplasma or Ehrlichia DNA. Serologically, B. burgdorferi (5.5%) was the most prevalent FVBP followed by A. phagocytophilum (1.8%). Ehrlichia spp. antibodies were found in 0.14% (12/715) of cats with species-specific seroreactivity to E. canis (n = 5), E. ewingii (n = 2) and E. chaffeensis (n = 1). Of seropositive cats, 16% (9/56) were exposed to more than one FVBP, all of which were exposed to B. burgdorferi and either A. phagocytophilum (n = 7) or E. ewingii (n = 2). Based upon PCR and DNA sequencing, 4, 3, 3, 2, and 1 cat were infected with A. phagocytophilum, A. platys, E. ewingii, E. chaffeensis and E. canis, respectively.

conclusionsCats are exposed to and can be infected with vector-borne pathogens that commonly infect dogs and humans. To our knowledge, this study provides the first evidence for E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii infection in naturally-exposed cats in North America. Results from this study support the need for regional, serological and molecular FVBP prevalence studies, the need to further optimize serodiagnostic and PCR testing for cats, and the need for prospective studies to better characterize clinicopathological disease manifestations in cats infected with FVBP.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialCat DiseasesCatsEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisFemaleMalePeptidesPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesSpecies SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialPeptides

Identifiers

PMID26062723
PMCPMC4465321
OpenAlexW1962629852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.