ArticleNature2015
Reproducibility: use mouse biobanks or lose them.
Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A quality framework for cryopreserved rodent disease models: INFRAFRONTIER quality principles in EMMA archiving and distribution.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Review
- Article
- Retrospective analysis and decentralized distribution to improve the lifecycle of Ah receptor research assets.Biochemical pharmacology · 2025Article
- The mutant mouse resource and research center (MMRRC) consortium: the US-based public mouse repository system.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024Review
- Establishing a Mouse Genotyping Core Facility Based on Automation, High-resolution Melting Analysis, and Purpose-developed MATLAB Applications for Sample Tracking, Data Analysis, and Report Generation.Comparative medicine · 2024Article
- Improving laboratory animal genetic reporting: LAG-R guidelines.Nature communications · 2024Review
- The Cold Futures of Mouse Genetics: Modes of Strain Cryopreservation Since the 1970s.Science, technology & human values · 2023Article
- Knockout mice are an important tool for human monogenic heart disease studies.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- Genetic quality: a complex issue for experimental study reproducibility.Transgenic research · 2022Review
- Importing genetically altered animals: ensuring quality.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022Review
- Article
- High-throughput genotyping of high-homology mutant mouse strains by next-generation sequencing.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Differences in bone structure and unloading-induced bone loss between C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017Article
- Sharing mutations: are biobanks still required in the post-CRISPR/Cas9 era?Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017Review
- Accelerating Biomedical Discoveries through Rigor and Transparency.ILAR journal · 2017Article
- INFRAFRONTIER: a European resource for studying the functional basis of human disease.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016Review
- Simple and reliable genotyping protocol for mouse Prkdc(SCID) mutation.Journal of immunological methods · 2016Article
- Using the GEMM-ESC strategy to study gene function in mouse models.Nature protocols · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.