Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26061817›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Continuous representation of tumor microvessel density and detection of angiogenic hotspots in histological whole-slide images.

Jakob Nikolas Kather, Alexander Marx, Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro, Lothar R Schad, Frank Gerrit Zöllner, Cleo-Aron Weis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. CD34 and CD105 Microvessels in Resected Bone Specimen May Implicate Wound Healing in MRONJ.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jakob Nikolas KatherInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Alexander MarxInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Constantino Carlos Reyes-AldasoroSchool of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, City University London, United Kingdom.
Lothar R SchadComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Frank Gerrit ZöllnerComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Cleo-Aron WeisInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
University Medical Centre Mannheim · DECity, University of London · GBUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood vessels in solid tumors are not randomly distributed, but are clustered in angiogenic hotspots. Tumor microvessel density (MVD) within these hotspots correlates with patient survival and is widely used both in diagnostic routine and in clinical trials. Still, these hotspots are usually subjectively defined. There is no unbiased, continuous and explicit representation of tumor vessel distribution in histological whole slide images. This shortcoming distorts angiogenesis measurements and may account for ambiguous results in the literature. In the present study, we describe and evaluate a new method that eliminates this bias and makes angiogenesis quantification more objective and more efficient. Our approach involves automatic slide scanning, automatic image analysis and spatial statistical analysis. By comparing a continuous MVD function of the actual sample to random point patterns, we introduce an objective criterion for hotspot detection: An angiogenic hotspot is defined as a clustering of blood vessels that is very unlikely to occur randomly. We evaluate the proposed method in N=11 images of human colorectal carcinoma samples and compare the results to a blinded human observer. For the first time, we demonstrate the existence of statistically significant hotspots in tumor images and provide a tool to accurately detect these hotspots.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalColonic NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicrovesselsModels, StatisticalNeovascularization, Pathologicdigital pathologyspatial statisticstumor angiogenesisvessel density

Identifiers

PMID26061817
PMCPMC4662482
OpenAlexW1939738412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.