Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26061684›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2015

Alterations of the spindle checkpoint pathway in clinicopathologically aggressive CpG island methylator phenotype clear cell renal cell carcinomas.

Eri Arai, Masahiro Gotoh, Ying Tian, Hiromi Sakamoto, Masaya Ono, Akio Matsuda, Yoriko Takahashi, Sayaka Miyata, Hirohiko Totsuka, Suenori Chiku and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of NEK2 in tumorigenesis and tumor progression.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of motor proteins in human cancers.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Eri AraiDivision of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro GotohDivision of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ying TianDivision of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi SakamotoDivision of Genetics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya OnoDivision of Chemotherapy and Clinical Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Akio MatsudaDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoriko TakahashiBioscience Department, Business Development Division, Mitsui Knowledge Industry Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Sayaka MiyataBioscience Department, Business Development Division, Mitsui Knowledge Industry Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohiko TotsukaBioinformatics Group, Research and Development Center, Solution Division 4, Hitachi Government and Public Corporation System Engineering Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Suenori ChikuScience Solutions Division, Mizuho Information and Research Institute, Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Motokiyo KomiyamaDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki FujimotoDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji MatsumotoDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Tesshi YamadaDivision of Chemotherapy and Clinical Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruhiko YoshidaDivision of Genetics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yae KanaiDivision of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsui (Japan) · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPHitachi (Japan) · JPMizuho (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CpG-island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-positive clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are characterized by accumulation of DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands, clinicopathological aggressiveness and poor patient outcome. The aim of this study was to clarify the molecular pathways participating in CIMP-positive renal carcinogenesis. Genome (whole-exome and copy number), transcriptome and proteome (two-dimensional image converted analysis of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) analyses were performed using tissue specimens of 87 CIMP-negative and 14 CIMP-positive clear cell RCCs and corresponding specimens of non-cancerous renal cortex. Genes encoding microtubule-associated proteins, such as DNAH2, DNAH5, DNAH10, RP1 and HAUS8, showed a 10% or higher incidence of genetic aberrations (non-synonymous single-nucleotide mutations and insertions/deletions) in CIMP-positive RCCs, whereas CIMP-negative RCCs lacked distinct genetic characteristics. MetaCore pathway analysis of CIMP-positive RCCs revealed that alterations of mRNA or protein expression were significantly accumulated in six pathways, all participating in the spindle checkpoint, including the "The metaphase checkpoint (p = 1.427 × 10(-6))," "Role of Anaphase Promoting Complex in cell cycle regulation (p = 7.444 × 10(-6))" and "Spindle assembly and chromosome separation (p = 9.260 × 10(-6))" pathways. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that mRNA expression levels for genes included in such pathways, i.e., AURKA, AURKB, BIRC5, BUB1, CDC20, NEK2 and SPC25, were significantly higher in CIMP-positive than in CIMP-negative RCCs. All CIMP-positive RCCs showed overexpression of Aurora kinases, AURKA and AURKB, and this overexpression was mainly attributable to increased copy number. These data suggest that abnormalities of the spindle checkpoint pathway participate in CIMP-positive renal carcinogenesis, and that AURKA and AURKB may be potential therapeutic targets in more aggressive CIMP-positive RCCs.

Indexed as

AgedAurora KinasesCarcinogenesisCarcinoma, Renal CellChromosome AberrationsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationFemaleGene DosageHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsPhenotypeAurora KinasesMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsProteomeaurora kinasesclear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC)CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)multi-layer omics analysisspindle checkpoint

Identifiers

PMID26061684
PMCPMC4755138
OpenAlexW1865469179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.