Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26061527›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Prioritising Infectious Disease Mapping.

David M Pigott, Rosalind E Howes, Antoinette Wiebe, Katherine E Battle, Nick Golding, Peter W Gething, Scott F Dowell, Tamer H Farag, Andres J Garcia, Ann M Kimball and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Spatial drivers of COVID-19 vulnerability in Nigeria.The Pan African medical journal · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

David M PigottSpatial Ecology & Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rosalind E HowesSpatial Ecology & Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Antoinette WiebeSpatial Ecology & Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Katherine E BattleSpatial Ecology & Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nick GoldingWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter W GethingSpatial Ecology & Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Scott F DowellBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Tamer H FaragBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Andres J GarciaBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ann M KimballBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
L Kendall KrauseBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Craig H SmithBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Simon J BrookerLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Hmwe H KyuInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Theo VosInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christopher J L MurrayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Catherine L MoyesWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Simon I HayWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092765Wellcome Trust 095066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing volumes of data and computational capacity afford unprecedented opportunities to scale up infectious disease (ID) mapping for public health uses. Whilst a large number of IDs show global spatial variation, comprehensive knowledge of these geographic patterns is poor. Here we use an objective method to prioritise mapping efforts to begin to address the large deficit in global disease maps currently available. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsAutomation of ID mapping requires bespoke methodological adjustments tailored to the epidemiological characteristics of different types of diseases. Diseases were therefore grouped into 33 clusters based upon taxonomic divisions and shared epidemiological characteristics. Disability-adjusted life years, derived from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, were used as a globally consistent metric of disease burden. A review of global health stakeholders, existing literature and national health priorities was undertaken to assess relative interest in the diseases. The clusters were ranked by combining both metrics, which identified 44 diseases of main concern within 15 principle clusters. Whilst malaria, HIV and tuberculosis were the highest priority due to their considerable burden, the high priority clusters were dominated by neglected tropical diseases and vector-borne parasites. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A quantitative, easily-updated and flexible framework for prioritising diseases is presented here. The study identifies a possible future strategy for those diseases where significant knowledge gaps remain, as well as recognising those where global mapping programs have already made significant progress. For many conditions, potential shared epidemiological information has yet to be exploited.

Indexed as

Geographic MappingGlobal HealthBiosurveillanceCommunicable DiseasesHumansPublic HealthQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID26061527
PMCPMC4464526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.