Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26061425›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Predictive Modeling of Drug Response in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Hermann B Frieboes, Bryan R Smith, Zhihui Wang, Masakatsu Kotsuma, Ken Ito, Armin Day, Benjamin Cahill, Colin Flinders, Shannon M Mumenthaler, Parag Mallick and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mathematical Modeling to Address Challenges in Pancreatic Cancer.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
  7. Development of a Physiologically-Based Mathematical Model for Quantifying Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumors.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic Targeting in Cancer Treatment.Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Hermann B FrieboesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, United States of America; James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, United States of America; Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
Bryan R SmithMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America.
Zhihui WangDepartment of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
Masakatsu KotsumaMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America.
Ken ItoMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America.
Armin DayDepartment of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
Benjamin CahillDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, United States of America.
Colin FlindersDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States of America; Center for Applied Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, United States of America.
Shannon M MumenthalerCenter for Applied Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, United States of America.
Parag MallickMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America.
Eman SimbawaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
A S Al-FhaidDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
S R MahmoudDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Sanjiv S GambhirMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America; Department of Materials Science & Engineering, and Bio-X, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America.
Vittorio CristiniDepartment of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America; Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia; Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
Stanford University · USKing Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of New Mexico · USJames Graham Brown Foundation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

UNM TRAININGP50GM085273 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI EDWARDS, JEREMY S · 2009 to 2018
$26.1M
Stanford Nanocharacterization LaboratoryU54CA119367 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2006 to 2010
$19.8M
Small Animal ImagingP50CA114747 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CONTAG, CHRISTOPHER H · 2005 to 2014
$18.2M
TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2009 to 2013
$15.2M
Pilot ProjectsU54CA151459 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, JIANGHONG · 2010 to 2014
$12.6M
The Core of the Computational BiologyU54CA149196 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WONG, STEPHEN TC · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
Reporter Imaging of Protein-Protein InteractionsR01CA082214 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 1999 to 2019
$5.9M
Modeling and Predicting Therapeutic Resistance of CancerU01CA188383 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W, GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
How do Nanoparticles Target Cancer? An In Vivo Experimental/Mathematical StudyK99CA160764 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, BRYAN RONAIN · 2011 to 2012
$348k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA160764NCI NIH HHS P50 CA114747NCI NIH HHS P50CA114747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082214NCI NIH HHS U01 CA188383NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119367NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143907NCI NIH HHS U54CA143907NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149196NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151459NCI NIH HHS U54CA151459NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM085273NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM085273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We combine mathematical modeling with experiments in living mice to quantify the relative roles of intrinsic cellular vs. tissue-scale physiological contributors to chemotherapy drug resistance, which are difficult to understand solely through experimentation. Experiments in cell culture and in mice with drug-sensitive (Eµ-myc/Arf-/-) and drug-resistant (Eµ-myc/p53-/-) lymphoma cell lines were conducted to calibrate and validate a mechanistic mathematical model. Inputs to inform the model include tumor drug transport characteristics, such as blood volume fraction, average geometric mean blood vessel radius, drug diffusion penetration distance, and drug response in cell culture. Model results show that the drug response in mice, represented by the fraction of dead tumor volume, can be reliably predicted from these inputs. Hence, a proof-of-principle for predictive quantification of lymphoma drug therapy was established based on both cellular and tissue-scale physiological contributions. We further demonstrate that, if the in vitro cytotoxic response of a specific cancer cell line under chemotherapy is known, the model is then able to predict the treatment efficacy in vivo. Lastly, tissue blood volume fraction was determined to be the most sensitive model parameter and a primary contributor to drug resistance.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCell SurvivalDoxorubicinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFibroblastsLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMiceTumor Cells, CulturedXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID26061425
PMCPMC4464754
OpenAlexW1791355225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.