Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26060437›Full record

ArticleThe plant pathology journal2015

Reaction of Cauliflower Genotypes to Black Rot of Crucifers.

Lincon Rafael da Silva, Renan César Dias da Silva, Atalita Francis Cardoso, Gláucia de Mello Pelá, Daniel Diego Costa Carvalho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant pathology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lincon Rafael da SilvaLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Goiás State University (UEG), Rodovia GO 330, km 241, Anel Viário, Setor Universitário, 75780-000, Ipameri, Goiás, Brazil.
Renan César Dias da SilvaLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Goiás State University (UEG), Rodovia GO 330, km 241, Anel Viário, Setor Universitário, 75780-000, Ipameri, Goiás, Brazil.
Atalita Francis CardosoDepartment of Plant Production, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Av. João Naves de Ávila, 2121, Campus Santa Mônica, CP 593, 38408-100, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gláucia de Mello PeláLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Goiás State University (UEG), Rodovia GO 330, km 241, Anel Viário, Setor Universitário, 75780-000, Ipameri, Goiás, Brazil.
Daniel Diego Costa CarvalhoLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Goiás State University (UEG), Rodovia GO 330, km 241, Anel Viário, Setor Universitário, 75780-000, Ipameri, Goiás, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate six cauliflower genotypes regarding their resistance to black rot and their production performance. To do so, it was conducted two field experiments in Ipameri, Goiás, Brazil, in 2012 and 2013. It was used a randomized block design, with four replications (total of 24 plots). Each plot consisted of three planting lines 2.5 m long (six plants/line), spaced 1.0 m apart, for a total area of 7.5 m(2). Evaluations of black rot severity were performed at 45 days after transplanting, this is, 75 days after sowing (DAS), and yield evaluations at 90 to 105 DAS. The Verona 184 genotype was the most resistant to black rot, showing 1.87 and 2.25% of leaf area covered by black rot symptom (LACBRS) in 2012 and 2013. However, it was not among the most productive materials. The yield of the genotypes varied between 15.14 and 25.83 t/ha in both years, Lisvera F1 (21.78 and 24.60 t/ha) and Cindy (19.95 and 23.56 t/ha) being the most productive. However, Lisvera F1 showed 6.37 and 9.37% of LACBRS and Cindy showed 14.25 and 14.87% of LACBRS in 2012 and 2013, being both considered as tolerant to black rot.

Indexed as

Brassica oleracea var. botrytisdisease resistanceplant breedingXanthomonas campestris pv. campestris

Identifiers

PMID26060437
PMCPMC4453999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.