Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26060313›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Empirical inference of circuitry and plasticity in a kinase signaling network.

Edmund H Wilkes, Camille Terfve, John G Gribben, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Pedro Rodriguez Cutillas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: Does it work?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edmund H WilkesCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom;
Camille TerfveEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
John G GribbenCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom;
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Pedro Rodriguez CutillasCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; p.cutillas@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M006174/1Cancer Research UK C236/A11795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of physiology and disease is hampered by the difficulty of measuring the circuitry and plasticity of signaling networks that regulate cell biology, and how these relate to phenotypes. Here, using mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics, we systematically characterized the topology of a network comprising the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MEK/ERK signaling axes and confirmed its biological relevance by assessing its dynamics upon EGF and IGF1 stimulation. Measuring the activity of this network in models of acquired drug resistance revealed that cells chronically treated with PI3K or mTORC1/2 inhibitors differed in the way their networks were remodeled. Unexpectedly, we also observed a degree of heterogeneity in the network state between cells resistant to the same inhibitor, indicating that even identical and carefully controlled experimental conditions can give rise to the evolution of distinct kinase network statuses. These data suggest that the initial conditions of the system do not necessarily determine the mechanism by which cancer cells become resistant to PI3K/mTOR targeted therapies. The patterns of signaling network activity observed in the resistant cells mirrored the patterns of response to several drug combination treatments, suggesting that the activity of the defined signaling network truly reflected the evolved phenotypic diversity.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionEmpirical ResearchEnzyme InhibitorsHumansMCF-7 CellsPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationPhosphotransferasesProteomicsEnzyme InhibitorsPhosphoproteinsPhosphotransferasesMEKphosphoproteomicsPI3Ksignaling networksystems biology

Identifiers

PMID26060313
PMCPMC4485132
OpenAlexW1590736834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.