ArticleEuropean radiology2016
MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience.
Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2018Pooled it
- Detecting decompensation in cirrhotic patients with varying ascitic volumes using magnetic resonance elastography.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of liver fibrosis staging in patients with chronic hepatitis via the gadolinium washout rate: a comparative study with magnetic resonance elastography and pathology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Chronological change of gallbladder fossa nodularity in the liver as observed in patients with alcoholic liver disease: cross-sectional and longitudinal observation.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Upper Trapezius Muscle.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Review
- The Role of the Multiparametric MRI LiverMultiScanCancers · 2023Review
- Clinical study of the value of shear wave elastography in evaluating the degree of liver fibrosis in children.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Liver stiffness assessed by magnetic resonance elastography predicts clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and without chronic liver disease.European radiology · 2023Article
- Assessment of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation with look-locker T1 mapping and magnetic resonance elastography with histopathology as reference standard.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Staging: Comparison of MR Elastography with Extracellular Volume Fraction Analysis Using Contrast-Enhanced CT.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Development of three-dimensional integral-type reconstruction formula for magnetic resonance elastography.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Evaluation of liver fibrosis using hepatic extracellular volume fraction by contrast-enhanced computed tomography before and after direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: comparison with serological liver fibrosis markers.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Effect of breath holding at the end of the inspiration and expiration phases on liver stiffness measured by 2D-MR elastography.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- A proposed model on MR elastography for predicting postoperative major complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.BJR open · 2021Article
- Assessment of liver fibrosis with liver and spleen magnetic resonance elastography, serum markers in chronic liver disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.European radiology · 2020Article
- Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.European radiology · 2019Article
- Segmental Liver Stiffness Evaluated with Magnetic Resonance Elastography Is Responsive to Endovascular Intervention in Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Magnetic resonance elastography can predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma with longitudinally acquired two-point data.European radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo clarify the usefulness of 3.0-T MR elastography (MRE) in diagnosing the histological grades of liver fibrosis using preliminary clinical data. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween November 2012 and March 2014, MRE was applied to all patients who underwent liver MR study at a 3.0-T clinical unit. Among them, those who had pathological evaluation of liver tissue within 3 months from MR examinations were retrospectively recruited, and the liver stiffness measured by MRE was correlated with histological results. Institutional review board approved this study, waiving informed consent.
resultsThere were 70 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Liver stiffness showed significant correlation with the pathological grades of liver fibrosis (rho = 0.89, p < 0.0001, Spearman's rank correlation). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.93, 0.95, 0.99 and 0.95 for fibrosis score greater than or equal to F1, F2, F3 and F4, with cut-off values of 3.13, 3.85, 4.28 and 5.38 kPa, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested that grades of necroinflammation also affected liver stiffness, but to a significantly lesser degree as compared to fibrosis.
conclusions3.0-T clinical MRE was suggested to be sufficiently useful in assessing the grades of liver fibrosis. KEY POINTS: MR elastography may help clinicians assess patients with chronic liver diseases. Usefulness of 3.0-T MR elastography has rarely been reported. Measured liver stiffness correlated well with the histological grades of liver fibrosis. Measured liver stiffness was also affected by necroinflammation, but to a lesser degree. 3.0-T MRE could be a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26060066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.