Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26060041›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2015

Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland.

Pauline Duke, Marshall Godwin, Samuel Ratnam, Lesa Dawson, Daniel Fontaine, Adrian Lear, Martha Traverso-Yepez, Wendy Graham, Mohamad Ravalia, Gerry Mugford and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04278326 (Primary Organoid Models and Combined Nucleic Acids Therapeutics for Innovative Anti-HPV Treatments in Cervico-vaginal Cancers and Precancerous Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04278326 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Primary Organoid Models and Combined Nucleic Acids Therapeutics for Innovative Anti-HPV Treatments in Cervico-vaginal Cancers and Precancerous Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansRan2021 to 2021Enrolled14ConditionsHPV Infection, Vaginal Cancer, Cervical Dysplasia, Cervical CancerArmsVaginal Biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of 1,030,482 Cervical Smear Results in Brazilian Population.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline DukePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St John's, Canada. pduke@mun.ca.
Marshall GodwinPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St John's, Canada. godwinm@mun.ca.
Samuel RatnamPublic Health Laboratories, Eastern Health Authority, St. John's, Canada. Sam.ratnam@easternhealth.ca.
Lesa DawsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University, St. John's, Canada. lmdawson@mun.ca.
Daniel FontaineDepartment of Pathology, Eastern Health Authority, St. John's, Canada. hickeyfontaine@hotmail.com.
Adrian LearCancer Clinic, Eastern Health Authority, St. John's, Canada. adrian.lear@easternhealth.ca.
Martha Traverso-YepezCommunity Health and Humanities, Memorial University, St. John's, Canada. mtraverso@mun.ca.
Wendy GrahamDiscipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University, Newfoundland & Labrador, Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Room 424, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, A1B 3 V6, NL, Canada. Wendy.graham@med.mun.ca.
Mohamad RavaliaDiscipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University, Newfoundland & Labrador, Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Room 424, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, A1B 3 V6, NL, Canada. ravalia@mun.ca.
Gerry MugfordDepartment of Psychiatry, Memorial University, St. John's, Canada. gmugford@mun.ca.
Andrea PikePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St John's, Canada. Andrea.pike@med.mun.ca.
Jacqueline FortierPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St John's, Canada. Jacqueline.fortier@med.mun.ca.
Mandy PeachPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St John's, Canada. c64mep@mun.ca.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CAJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable if detected early through regular screening. Women in the Canadian province of Newfoundland & Labrador have relatively low rates of cervical cancer screening, with rates of around 40 % between 2007 and 2009. Persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer, and HPV testing, including self-sampling, has been suggested as an alternative method of cervical cancer screening that may alleviate some barriers to screening. Our objective was to determine whether offering self-collected HPV testing screening increased cervical cancer screening rates in rural communities.

methodsDuring the 2-year study, three community-based cohorts were assigned to receive either i) a cervical cancer education campaign with the option of HPV testing; ii) an educational campaign alone; iii) or no intervention. Self-collection kits were offered to eligible women at family medicine clinics and community centres, and participants were surveyed to determine their acceptance of the HPV self-collection kit. Paired proportions testing for before-after studies was used to determine differences in screening rates from baseline, and Chi Square analysis of three dimensional 2 × 2 × 2 tables compared the change between communities.

resultsCervical cancer screening increased by 15.2 % (p < 0.001) to 67.4 % in the community where self-collection was available, versus a 2.9 % increase (p = 0.07) in the community that received educational campaigns and 8.5 % in the community with no intervention (p = 0.193). The difference in change in rates was statistically significant between communities A and B (p < 0.001) but not between communities A and C (p = 0.193). The response rate was low, with only 9.5 % (168/1760) of eligible women opting to self-collect for HPV testing. Of the women who completed self-collection, 15.5 % (26) had not had a Pap smear in the last 3 years, and 88.7 % reported that they were somewhat or very satisfied with self-collection.

conclusionsOffering self-collected HPV testing increased the cervical cancer screening rate in a rural NL community. Women who completed self-collection had generally positive feelings about the experience. Offering HPV self-collection may increase screening compliance, particularly among women who do not present for routine Pap smears.

Indexed as

VaginaAdultAgedCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNewfoundland and LabradorPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsRural PopulationSelf-ExaminationSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical Dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID26060041
PMCPMC4461929
OpenAlexW2152321576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.